CIMT may predict risk of new-onset diabetes and diabetic neuropathy, finds study
Bulgaria: In a quest to unravel the intricate links between metabolic health and cardiovascular risk, a recent study has delved into the common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) in individuals with prediabetes and those newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The findings, published in the Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, offer valuable insights into early vascular changes associated with these conditions, potentially paving the way for enhanced risk stratification and preventive interventions.
The study found significantly greater intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery and a greater frequency of abnormal CIMT values in patients with new-onset diabetes compared to those with prediabetes and normoglycemia.
"CIMT has a high predictive value for the presence of sudomotor dysfunction, diabetic neuropathy, and the risk of new-onset diabetes," the researchers wrote.
Antoaneta Gateva, University Hospital Alexandrovska, Bulgaria, and colleagues aimed to evaluate the relationship between common carotid artery intima-media thickness in patients with prediabetes and new-onset diabetes mellitus without proven cardiovascular disease (CVD) and some classic cardio-metabolic risk factors.
The study included 461 obese patients with an average age of 53.2 ± 10.7 years. They were divided into three groups - group 1 without carbohydrate disturbances (n = 182), group 2 with prediabetes (n = 193), and group 3 with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (n = 86).
Based on the study, the researchers reported the following:
- The patients with new-onset diabetes had significantly higher mean CIMT values compared to those with prediabetes or without carbohydrate disturbances and a higher frequency of abnormal IMT values.
- CIMT correlated significantly with age, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and fasting blood glucose and showed a high predictive value for the presence of diabetic neuropathy and sudomotor dysfunction.
- Patients with abnormal CIMT values had a higher incidence of dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, peripheral neuropathy, metabolic syndrome, and sudomotor dysfunction.
- Patients who developed type 2 diabetes during follow-up had a significantly higher initial mean CIMT, which showed the highest predictive value for the risk of new-onset diabetes with CIMT≥0.7 mm, having 83% specificity and 53% sensitivity for the risk of progression to diabetes mellitus.
The findings show a clear association between increased IMT and the presence of sudomotor dysfunction and diabetic neuropathy. A high predictive value was also found for the presence of these complications. As CIMT is much easier to measure than a full Ewing battery, the study findings can be used to select patients for further evaluation for autonomic dysfunction.
"The results show that the significant predictive value of CIMT is present in patients above 45 years of age, so according to us, CIMT measurement should be performed in obese patients over 45 years of age and in cases where abnormal results are present (≥0.7 mm), the patients should be referred to carbohydrate and autonomic function evaluation," the researchers wrote.
"Despite the abundance of data on the relationship between CIMT, carbohydrate disturbances, and the CVD risk progression, we demonstrate for the first time its predictive role for progression to diabetes in obese patients," they concluded.
Reference:
Gateva, A., Assyov, Y., Karamfilova, V., & Kamenov, Z. (2024). Common carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) in patients with prediabetes and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 38(7), 108766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108766
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.