Gastric bypass best weight loss option for diabetes patients, study finds

Written By :  Hina Zahid
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-02-17 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-02-17 03:30 GMT
Advertisement

NEW YORK, NY - Bariatric surgery-either gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy-is recommended for people with type 2 diabetes and a body mass index of 40 or above. But the optimal treatment remains unclear and may depend on the severity of the patient's diabetes.

Using data from previous studies and databases, researchers at Columbia University's Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, led by Chin Hur, MD, MPH, created a model to investigate the effectiveness, quality of life gains, costs, and complications of gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and medical therapy among patients over a five-year period.

Advertisement

The study is the first to consider diabetes severity in a comparison of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, which are the two most popular forms of bariatric surgery in the United States.

Gastric bypass is a more complex procedure than sleeve gastrectomy, and previous studies show it is associated with more complications. Gastric bypass creates a small pouch in the stomach that is attached to the small intestine, so that food bypasses much of the stomach and some of the small intestine. After the surgery, less food can be ingested and absorbed. In sleeve gastrectomy, the stomach is permanently reduced to about one quarter of its original size, but no bypass is created.

The new analysis projected that gastric bypass leads to greater weight loss and a greater rate of remission of diabetes than sleeve gastrectomy or medical therapy, which involves lifestyle counseling and medication.

Gastric bypass surgery also was projected to produce the best results regardless of diabetes severity.

"Determining which groups may benefit from a specific strategy is an important step toward personalized medicine," says Hur.

"Our study suggests that in most cases, gastric bypass is the preferred strategy when looking at a five-year time frame, despite higher upfront surgical costs and complications, and becomes even more cost-effective when considered over 10 or 30 years."

http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48317

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News