Haemoglobin Systolic Pressure Index Better Predicts CV Risk Than HbA1c or SBP Alone: Study

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Published On 2026-03-10 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2026-03-10 04:07 GMT

Researchers have found in a new study that the Haemoglobin–Systolic Pressure Index (HSI), combining HbA1c and systolic blood pressure, was consistently associated with incident cardiovascular disease across three international cohorts. Its predictive performance exceeded that of HbA1c or SBP alone, suggesting it may serve as a practical tool for integrated cardiometabolic risk assessment.

Hypertension and diabetes are major drivers of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and their coexistence confers excess risk. This study aimed to develop a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)-systolic blood pressure (SBP) index (HSI) to simultaneously capture glucose and blood pressure status and investigate the associations of baseline and cumulative HSI with incident cardiovascular disease. Data were drawn from three population-based cohorts: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), and the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Baseline Haemoglobin–Systolic Pressure Indexwas calculated as HbA1c (%) × SBP (mmHg)/100. Cumulative Haemoglobin–Systolic Pressure Index was derived from repeated measurements weighted by time intervals. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate linear associations of baseline and cumulative Haemoglobin–Systolic Pressure Index with incident cardiovascular disease. Additionally, restricted cubic splines were used to assess nonlinear relationships.

Results: A total of 6,822 participants from CHARLS, 3,640 from ELSA, and 5,709 from HRS were included, with median follow-up of 9.0, 10.0, and 12.3 years, respectively. Across all three cohorts, the combination of elevated HbA1c and SBP was associated with the highest cardiovascular disease risk. Higher baseline Haemoglobin–Systolic Pressure Index were significantly associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease in the CHARLS (hazard ratio [HR] per 1 standard deviation [SD] increase =1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.22), ELSA (1.13, 95% CI 1.06–1.21), and HRS (1.14, 95% CI 1.10–1.19). Cumulative HSI levels were also significantly associated with elevated cardiovascular disease risk (CHARLS: HR per 1 SD increase = 1.19, 95% CI 1.12–1.26; ELSA: 1.14, 95% CI 1.04–1.26; HRS, 1.15, 95% CI 1.08–1.22). No evidence of nonlinearity between baseline Haemoglobin–Systolic Pressure Index and cardiovascular disease was detected. The associations were almost consistent across demographic and clinical subgroups. The predictive performance of Haemoglobin–Systolic Pressure Index was superior to HbA1c or SBP alone.

Haemoglobin–Systolic Pressure Index, a simple composite of HbA1c and SBP, was consistently associated with incident cardiovascular disease across three international cohorts. Its predictive ability exceeded that of HbA1c or SBP alone, highlighting it as a pragmatic tool for integrated cardiometabolic risk assessment. The findings warrant further clinical validation.


Reference:

Zhang R, Chen X, Zhou B, Xiang B, Zhu S. Hemoglobin A1c-systolic blood pressure index as a novel predictor of cardiovascular disease: evidence from three prospective cohorts. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2026 Feb 18;17:1718936. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1718936. PMID: 41788769; PMCID: PMC12956636.


Keywords:

HSI, Predicts, Cardiovascular Risk, HbA1c, SBP, Study, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hemoglobin A1c, hypertension, prediction, systolic blood pressure, Zhang R, Chen X, Zhou B, Xiang B, Zhu S




Tags:    
Article Source : Frontiers in Endocrinology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News