New Analysis Links Detectable C-Peptide Levels to Improved Health Outcomes in Type 1 Diabetes

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-11-01 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-11-01 06:52 GMT
Advertisement

Iran: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis has shown that individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) with detectable C-peptide levels may achieve improved clinical outcomes and a reduced risk of microvascular complications. The study was published online in the Journal of Diabetes and its Complications on September 26, 2024.

"People with T1DM who had detectable C-peptide levels used less insulin daily and had lower average HbA1c levels than those with undetectable C-peptide. They also had a lower chance of developing retinopathy and nephropathy, with odds ratios of 0.53 and 0.62, respectively," the researchers reported.

Advertisement

C-peptide, a byproduct of insulin production, is a crucial indicator of endogenous insulin secretion. In individuals with T1DM, the pancreas typically produces little to no insulin, leading to a reliance on exogenous insulin therapy. However, detectable C-peptide levels suggest some residual beta-cell function, which could significantly impact glycemic management and overall health.

Several studies have explored the relationship between detectable levels of C-peptide and glycemic control and the onset of chronic complications in Type 1 Diabetes, encompassing macrovascular and microvascular diseases. In light of this, Parham Samimisedeh, Cardiovascular Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran, and colleagues sought to synthesize the existing evidence regarding the clinical significance of detectable C-peptide levels in individuals with T1DM.

For this purpose, the researchers conducted a systematic search of online databases using key terms such as T1DM, C-peptide, diabetes mellitus complications, and glycemic parameters. They aggregated the data to calculate pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios (OR).

The researchers analyzed 1,519 articles from the initial search, identifying 38 studies that met their eligibility criteria—comprising 12 cohort studies and 26 cross-sectional studies. The following were the findings from the review:

  • Individuals with detectable C-peptide levels had significantly lower mean HbA1c than those with undetectable levels, with a pooled standardized mean difference of −0.08.
  • The detectable C-peptide group required lower daily insulin doses, with a difference of −0.41.
  • The group exhibited reduced odds of developing retinopathy (pooled crude odds ratio (OR): 0.53) and nephropathy complications (OR: 0.62).
  • No significant differences were found between the two groups for neuropathy (OR: 0.92).

According to the authors, the study is the first systematic review to investigate the relationship between C-peptide levels and key parameters in individuals with T1DM.

"Those with detectable C-peptide levels may achieve better glycemic control, characterized by lower HbA1c levels, reduced daily insulin requirements, and a decreased likelihood of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Additionally, detectable C-peptide levels are likely associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycemic events," the researchers wrote.

Reference:

Alan, M. S., Tayebi, A., Afshar, E. J., Alan, S. S., Alan, M. S., Fazeli, R., Sohbatzade, T., Samimisedeh, P., & Rastad, H. (2024). Association of detectable C-peptide levels with glycemic control and chronic complications in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 108867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108867

Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News