No impact of PCSK9 inhibitors on glucose metabolism among patients of hypercholesterolemia with prediabetes
Spain: A recent real-life study published in Cardiovascular Diabetology has shed light on the impact of PCSK9 inhibitors in glycaemic control and new-onset diabetes in patients treated for at least three years.
The researchers found a nonsignificant increase in new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) in the PCSK9i group, particularly in patients with prediabetes. Overall, the findings suggested that the effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on glucose metabolism may not be a significant concern in clinical practice.
Clinical trials, Mendelian randomisation studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated the diabetogenic effect of statins. According to large clinical trials, PCSK9 inhibitors have no adverse impact on glucose metabolism. However, few real-life studies have yet assessed the long-term effects of these drugs on glucose homeostasis and their impact on new-onset diabetes.
To fill this knowledge gap, Ana M. González-Lleó and colleagues from Spain aimed to examine the development of glucose metabolism disorders and new-onset DM in patients with hypercholesterolemia receiving treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors.
For this purpose, the researchers studied 218 patients treated with either evolocumab or alirocumab (70% with familial hypercholesterolemia) for at least three years (PCSK9iG). They studied the NODM rate in the nondiabetic group at baseline (168) and overall glucose metabolism control in the whole group.
A comparison of incidental diabetes mellitus was drawn between the two groups. The first was a propensity score matching (PSM)-selected group (n = 168) from the database of patients attending the Reus lipid unit (Metbank, n = 745) who were not on PCSK9i (PSMG). The second was a subgroup with a similar age range (n = 563) of the Di@bet.es study (Spanish prospective study on diabetes development n = 5072) (D@G). The incidence was determined as the percentage of NODM cases per year.
The researchers reported the following findings:
· There was an increase in fasting glucose (FG) level of the subjects with normoglycaemia at baseline from 91 to 93 mg/dL.
· There were 14 NODM cases in the PCSK9i group (2.6%/y), all among people with prediabetes at baseline.
· The incidence of NODM in PSMG and D@G was 1.8%/y (compared with the PCSK9Ig).
· The incidence among the subjects with prediabetes was 5.1%/y in the PCSK9iG, 4.8%/y in the PSMG and 3.9%/y in the D@G.
· In the multivariate analysis, only the FG level was associated with the development of NODM in the PCSK9iG (OR 1.1).
· There was no significant change in FG or A1c levels in patients with diabetes at baseline.
The study revealed that in the PCSK9iG, a nonsignificant increase in NODM occurred, particularly in patients with prediabetes, compared with the PSMG and D@G groups. Baseline FG levels were the main variable associated with diabetes development. In the subjects who had DM at baseline, there was no change in glucose control.
"Our findings do not support a clinically relevant effect of PCSK9 on the risk of diabetes," the researchers wrote. "In any case, the impact of PCSK9i on glucose homeostasis, if any, should not modify the clinical decision-making process concerning the prescription of these therapies."
Reference:
González-Lleó AM, Sánchez-Hernández RM, Plana N, Ibarretxe D, Rehues P, Ribalta J, Llop D, Wägner AM, Masana L, Boronat M. Impact of PCSK9 inhibitors in glycaemic control and new-onset diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Jan 3;23(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02077-y. PMID: 38172901; PMCID: PMC10765818.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.