Triple Drug Therapy improves Hepatic Outcomes and Insulin sensitivity in diabetics

Written By :  MD Bureau
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2021-12-10 04:00 GMT   |   Update On 2021-12-10 04:13 GMT
Advertisement

Hepatic steatosis is common among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Approximately 70% of patients who are obese or who have type 2 diabetes develop the non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and 20% of these patients show progression to non‐alcoholic High-Grade PVC.

In a recent study, researchers have found that treating T2D patients with triple therapy (metformin/exenatide/pioglitazone) had less hepatic steatosis and fibrosis and significantly improved insulin sensitivity when compared with conventional therapy, after 6 years.

Advertisement

The study findings were presented at the 19th Annual World Congress Insulin Resistance Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease (WCIRDC) meeting.

The EDICT study is an ongoing single-centre (Texas Diabetes Institute) randomized controlled trial designed to compare two therapeutic approaches for the management of patients with new-onset T2DM. Dr Olga Lavrynenko and her team conducted a study to compare the efficacy of Triple Therapy (metformin/exenatide/pioglitazone) versus Conventional Therapy (metformin→glipizide→glargine insulin) on liver fat, hepatic fibrosis, and insulin resistance in newly diagnosed T2DM patients in EDICT.

The researchers included a total of 39 patients who completed the 3-year follow-up, entered the 3-year extension phase and had the measurements of hepatic fat content and liver fibrosis done at the end of the study. They assessed the measurements of FPG, FPI, HbA1c, OGTT, and body fat at baseline and study end. They also evaluated the liver function tests, AST, ALT, platelets, albumin at baseline and annually for 6 years. They determined HbA1c was >6.5% as treatment failure.

Patients received vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) (FibroScan) measurement at the end of the study to provide a measure of liver fibrosis (LSM) and hepatic steatosis (CAP). From the LSM value, the severity of fibrosis was graded as <6 (F0, normal), 6 - 8 (F1/2), 8 - 12 (F3), and 12+ (F4, cirrhosis). Based on the CAP value (dB/m), the severity of hepatic steatosis was graded as either 100 - 233 (S0), 234 - 268 (S1), 269 - 300 (S2), and 300 + (S3). The researchers assessed the hepatic fat using MR spectroscopy (MRS) and performed quantitation of hepatic fat content (MRS-PDFF) using a 3- Tesla MRI Scanner.

Key findings of the study:

  • Upon analysis, the researchers found that 27 of 39 (69%) patients receiving Conventional Therapy had grade 2/3 steatosis compared to 9 of 29 (31%) in triple therapy.
  • They also found that 10 of 39 (26%) receiving Conventional Therapy had grade 3/4 fibrosis versus 2 of 29 (7%) in Triple Therapy.
  • They noted that the Triple Therapy increased Matsuda Index of insulin sensitivity 3-fold, whereas Conventional Therapy had no effect on insulin sensitivity.
  • They further noted that the severity of steatosis, measured by CAP (r = 0.42) and severity of fibrosis measured by LSM (r = -0.48) correlated inversely with the Matsuda index of insulin sensitivity.
  • They observed that the severity of steatosis by MRI-PDFF also correlated with insulin resistance (HOMA-IR and Matsuda Index) (r=0.42).

The authors concluded,

  • "T2DM subjects treated with Triple Therapy had less hepatic steatosis and fibrosis and markedly improved insulin sensitivity versus Conventional Therapy after 6 years.
  • Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were strongly and inversely correlated with insulin resistance.
  • Antidiabetic agents that ameliorate insulin resistance reduce hepatic fat and prevent fibrosis."

For further information:

Olga Lavrynenko, MD, PhD et al., "Hepatic Steatosis, Fibrosis, and Insulin Resistance: Implications for Therapy", Abstract #0059.

Tags:    
Article Source :  World Congress Insulin Resistance Diabetes & Cardiovascular Disease meeting

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News