A Doctor is saved because of proper documentation !!!
Advertisement
“When a patient dies or suffers some mishap, there is a tendency to blame the doctor for this. Things have gone wrong and, therefore, somebody must be punished for it. However, it is well known that even the best professionals, what to say of the average professional, sometimes have failures. A lawyer cannot win every case in his professional career but surely he cannot be penalized for losing a case provided he appeared in it and made his submissions.”
Relying on these observations of hon. Apex Court in the celebrated case of Jacob Mathew V/s. State of Punjab, (2005) 6 SCC 1, the National Commission Dismissed the Negligence case against the Doctors by its recent order dated 01/12/2015 in the case of ARCHANA SHARMA & 2 ORS.. V/s. NORTH STAR HOSPITAL & JOINT REPLACEMENT CENTRE & 4 ORS.
The Complainant alleged in her Complainant that her (since deceased) husband suffered fracture at the root of nose, in a car accident and he also sustained contusion on the left side of forehead, just above the left eyebrow and therefore he was shifted to Opponent Hospital...
Initially the Complainant had her own doubts about the decision of on duty Doctors to operate as according to her no specialist had seen CT Scan reports, however later on she gave her consent, but under alleged fear. It was alleged that one Homeopath Dr. gave injections of Phenergan and Serenace and lastly Butrum 2 mg, which was also opposed by the relatives. Thereafter the patient has breathing problems and due to nasal surgery, it was difficult for him to breath and lastly he was shifted to ICU, but in vain. The Complainant also alleged that it was not an ICU with all the equipments, but an ordinary room !!!
However the Complaint was dismissed my the State commission of Lucknow, U.P.
The National Commission after perusing the medical record and after hearing on parties, rejected the claim of Complainant. It observed that the injections were prescribed by the regular doctor of the Patient and rejected the allegations that the Consent was given under fear !!.
The Commission also relied on the observations of State Commission which did not accept the Ethical Committee Report based merely on the statements of persons of the complainant’s side. The injection Butrum was administered to the patient and that too by Dr. D. K. Singh was held to be not proved..
The Commission further observed that, the it is a fact that the patient was a drug addict, chronic alcoholic and was not in a good health. On 20-05-2012, Dr.Ravikumar, the regular Doctor himself prescribed necessary medication viz. Tab Encorate 500 Mg., Tab Librate and injection Lopez. along with Phenargan injection, Serenace injection and Alprax tablet, were also prescribed and There is no rebuttal of these facts by the complainant.
Yet again this judgment emphasises the important fact of proper documentation !!! No documentation is no defense and poor documentation is a poor defense !! What one should learn from these judgments is "dos and donts" !!!
Thanks and Regards
Adv. Rohit Erande
You can get a copy of the judgement at the link below:
ARCHANA SHARMA & 2 ORS Versus NORTH STAR HOSPITAL & JOINT REPLACEMENT CENTRE & 4 ORS.
Relying on these observations of hon. Apex Court in the celebrated case of Jacob Mathew V/s. State of Punjab, (2005) 6 SCC 1, the National Commission Dismissed the Negligence case against the Doctors by its recent order dated 01/12/2015 in the case of ARCHANA SHARMA & 2 ORS.. V/s. NORTH STAR HOSPITAL & JOINT REPLACEMENT CENTRE & 4 ORS.
The Complainant alleged in her Complainant that her (since deceased) husband suffered fracture at the root of nose, in a car accident and he also sustained contusion on the left side of forehead, just above the left eyebrow and therefore he was shifted to Opponent Hospital...
Initially the Complainant had her own doubts about the decision of on duty Doctors to operate as according to her no specialist had seen CT Scan reports, however later on she gave her consent, but under alleged fear. It was alleged that one Homeopath Dr. gave injections of Phenergan and Serenace and lastly Butrum 2 mg, which was also opposed by the relatives. Thereafter the patient has breathing problems and due to nasal surgery, it was difficult for him to breath and lastly he was shifted to ICU, but in vain. The Complainant also alleged that it was not an ICU with all the equipments, but an ordinary room !!!
However the Complaint was dismissed my the State commission of Lucknow, U.P.
The National Commission after perusing the medical record and after hearing on parties, rejected the claim of Complainant. It observed that the injections were prescribed by the regular doctor of the Patient and rejected the allegations that the Consent was given under fear !!.
The Commission also relied on the observations of State Commission which did not accept the Ethical Committee Report based merely on the statements of persons of the complainant’s side. The injection Butrum was administered to the patient and that too by Dr. D. K. Singh was held to be not proved..
The Commission further observed that, the it is a fact that the patient was a drug addict, chronic alcoholic and was not in a good health. On 20-05-2012, Dr.Ravikumar, the regular Doctor himself prescribed necessary medication viz. Tab Encorate 500 Mg., Tab Librate and injection Lopez. along with Phenargan injection, Serenace injection and Alprax tablet, were also prescribed and There is no rebuttal of these facts by the complainant.
Yet again this judgment emphasises the important fact of proper documentation !!! No documentation is no defense and poor documentation is a poor defense !! What one should learn from these judgments is "dos and donts" !!!
Thanks and Regards
Adv. Rohit Erande
You can get a copy of the judgement at the link below:
ARCHANA SHARMA & 2 ORS Versus NORTH STAR HOSPITAL & JOINT REPLACEMENT CENTRE & 4 ORS.
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.