Intensity-modulated radiation therapy alone effective in low-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma: JAMA

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-08-30 14:00 GMT   |   Update On 2022-08-30 15:58 GMT
Advertisement

Among patients with low-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy was not inferior for 3-year failure-free survival suggests a recent study published in the JAMA.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has been the standard treatment for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) based on data using 2-dimensional conventional radiotherapy. There is limited evidence for the role of chemotherapy with use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Advertisement

A study was conducted to assess whether concurrent chemotherapy can be safely omitted for patients with low-risk stage II/T3N0 NPC treated with IMRT.

This multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3, noninferiority clinical trial was conducted at 5 Chinese hospitals, including 341 adult patients with low-risk NPC, defined as stage II/T3N0M0 without adverse features (all nodes <3 cm, no level IV/Vb nodes; no extranodal extension; Epstein-Barr virus DNA <4000 copies/mL), with enrollment between November 2015 and August 2020. The final date of follow-up was March 15, 2022.

Patients were randomly assigned to receive IMRT alone (n = 172) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary end point was 3-year failure-free survival (time from randomization to any disease relapse or death), with a noninferiority margin of 10%. Secondary end points comprised overall survival, locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, adverse events, and health-related quality of life (QOL) measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30; range, 0-100 points; minimum clinically important difference ≥10 for physical function, symptom control, or health-related QOL; higher score indicates better functioning and global health status or worse symptoms).

Results:

  • Among 341 randomized patients, 334 completed the trial.
  • Median follow-up was 46 months.
  • Three-year failure-free survival was 90.5% for the IMRT-alone group vs 91.9% for the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group
  • No significant differences were observed between groups in overall survival, locoregional relapse, or distant metastasis.
  • The IMRT-alone group experienced a significantly lower incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events including hematologic toxicities (leukopenia, neutropenia) and nonhematologic toxicities (nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, mucositis).
  • The IMRT-alone group had significantly better QOL scores during radiotherapy including the domains of global health status, social functioning, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, and constipation.

Thus, among patients with low-risk NPC, treatment with IMRT alone resulted in 3-year failure-free survival that was not inferior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Reference:

Tang L, Guo R, Zhang N, et al. Effect of Radiotherapy Alone vs Radiotherapy With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy on Survival Without Disease Relapse in Patients With Low-risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;328(8):728–736. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.13997

Keywords:

Effect, Radiotherapy, Alone, Radiotherapy, Concurrent, Chemoradiotherapy, Survival, Without, Disease, Relapse, Patients, Low-risk, Nasopharyngeal, Carcinoma, Ling-Long Tang, Rui Guo, Ning Zhang, Bin Deng, Lei Chen, Zhi-Bin Cheng, Jing Huang, Wei-Han Hu, JAMA


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News