Escorts Hospital fined Rs 1 crore for medical negligence

Published On 2016-04-30 09:20 GMT | Update On 2016-04-30 09:20 GMT

New Delhi: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, taking a firm stand against Escorts Heart Hospital has imposed a fine of Rs 1 crore in a case of Medical Negligence.

Ironically, the major chunk of the fine ( Rs 75 Lakhs) comes in the form of penalty that is supposed to be deposited with the Consumer Welfare Fund. As ordered by the commission led by hon’ble NP Kaushik, this is for “doing unwanted treatment on the patients who are not easily identifiable by the Commission

”.

The remaining of this one crore, Rs 20 Lakh plus 12% interest since 2008 ( that is, Rs 25 lakhs approximately ) has to be paid by the hospital as compensation to a septuagenarian man, whose wife’s leg had to be amputated up to her thigh, reports Complainant K C Malhotra’s wife passed away during the pendency of the case.

Indian Express reports that, the complainant filed the case against the hospital alleging medical negligence in the year 2008. As per his complaint, his wife was treated in the hospital between September and November 2006, when a bypass surgery and subsequently a procedure to amputate her leg up to the thigh were carried out. She continued visiting the doctors at Escorts for post-operation care. The complaint adds that she suffered excruciating pain in spite of the treatments and remained completely handicapped despite the artificial limb, since the veins from the right leg had been removed for the bypass surgery. Malhotra accused Escorts of botching up the treatment, because of which her leg had to be amputated.

The hospital replied to the court, that it had followed a standard protocol, and that the patient had been duly informed about the the findings of the surgery and the unsuitability of the vessels for bypass, besides the risk of developing gangrene in the lower limb. An expert opinion from MAMC supported this argument that this was indeed a standard protocol.

The commission, however, observed that the patient had been first admitted to the hospital with complaints of acute pain in her left foot. During admission, a bypass surgery was conducted and she was discharged, but no other procedure was carried out for the treatment of peripheral vascular surgery or renal angioplasty, nor was she advised to report back. Reports have also indicated, the Commission said, that after the bypass surgery, her heart had become weaker and the muscles non-functional. It noted that she was also referred to a homeopathy doctor in another building of the same hospital, but Escorts sought to conceal this. No investigation or procedure was conducted on the patient for 10 days, before an “alarm went up one fine morning that her leg had to be amputated to save her life”, it said.

The commission noted

“A prolonged period of non-treatment led to the spread of gangrene and consequent amputation of the leg up to the thigh. It is, therefore, also a clear case of medical negligence and explained by the principle of res ipsa loquitur,”

Additional Penalty

In addition of the penalty to be paid to the complainant, the court also imposed exemplary penalty of Rs 75 lakh on Escorts, holding the hospital guilty of unfair trade practices by conducting tests and treatments on scores of other patients. The money shall be used in assisting consumers assert their rights and claim compensation under the Act. It also invoked the principle of res ipsa loquitur which fastens liability on a party based on the very nature and mere occurrence of an accident or injury as reported by Indian Express.

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Meghna A Singhania is the founder and Editor-in-Chief at Medical Dialogues. An Economics graduate from Delhi University and a post graduate from London School of Economics and Political Science, her key research interest lies in health economics, and policy making in health and medical sector in the country. She is a member of the Association of Healthcare Journalists. She can be contacted at meghna@medicaldialogues.in. Contact no. 011-43720751

Comments Policy

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Escorts Hospital fined Rs 1 crore for medical negligence

Similar News

Consumer Court junks Rs 20 lakh claim in implant failure case, exonerates TN hospital

Gujarat HC Upholds Mass Transfer of Around 500 ESIC Doctors, sets aside CAT order

Supreme court issues notice to NMC over delay in FMG Internship

Pay PG medicos on par with GMC students: Madras HC directs Annamalai University

429 Faculty quit AIIMS in 3 years

Himachal HC slams govt for 'ulterior motive' in retiring professor at 65, orders reinstatement

Consumer Court relief to Delhi Hospital, Cardiologist in Rs 5.5 crore medical negligence case

Misleading Medical Ads Case: SC disposes IMA plea, lifts stay on AYUSH ad Pre-approval rule