False Rape Case on Doctors: Court initiates Criminal Proceedings
Advertisement
New Delhi: Bringing major relief to two Delhi doctors, and announcing stern action in cases of false rape accusations, the Delhi High Court has recently announced criminal proceedings against a woman for making false allegations of gang rape against two Delhi-based doctors.
The case is that of a woman who used to work in a South Delhi Clinic as administrative assistant (field) and was terminated from the said services in 2013. In January 2014, she alleged that two doctors called her on the pretext of giving her job back and raped her. One of accused is a famous pediatrician who runs a charitable centre for micro nutrients studies for public health and the other doctor is an administrator in the centre, reports HT.
The court after going through the evidence echoed the decision of a trial court, acquitting the two doctors in the case. “It is highly improbable that the rape was committed inside a running office which has six cabins with transparent walls,” the bench said, adding that, “the medical evidence also shows no trauma, bite marks and abrasions on her person”.
The court further observed many inconsistencies in the statements given by the woman, including her arrival timing at the office on the day of the alleged incident. Noting that the woman’s testimony “
The case is that of a woman who used to work in a South Delhi Clinic as administrative assistant (field) and was terminated from the said services in 2013. In January 2014, she alleged that two doctors called her on the pretext of giving her job back and raped her. One of accused is a famous pediatrician who runs a charitable centre for micro nutrients studies for public health and the other doctor is an administrator in the centre, reports HT.
The court after going through the evidence echoed the decision of a trial court, acquitting the two doctors in the case. “It is highly improbable that the rape was committed inside a running office which has six cabins with transparent walls,” the bench said, adding that, “the medical evidence also shows no trauma, bite marks and abrasions on her person”.
The court further observed many inconsistencies in the statements given by the woman, including her arrival timing at the office on the day of the alleged incident. Noting that the woman’s testimony “
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.