GSK fined after anti-depressant sales probe in Britain
Advertisement
One of the world's biggest pharmaceutical giants, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), has been fined more than 37.1 pound sterling or $54 million, Britain's Competition and Markets Authority announced.
GSK and other companies were fined a total of 44.7 pound sterling or $65 million by the authority for anti-competitive conduct and agreements in relation to the supply of an anti-depressant drug, Xinhua reported.
The CMA said its decision relates to conduct and agreements between 2001 and 2004 in which GSK, the supplier of branded paroxetine (an anti-depressant medicine), agreed to make payments and other value transfers totalling over $72 million to suppliers of generic versions of the drug.
The CMA ruled the payments and other value transfers were aimed at delaying the potential entry of generic competitors into the British market for paroxetine.
The CMA said: "The CMA has also found that GSK's conduct, in making payments to GUK, Alpharma and one further company, Norton Healthcare Limited (IVAX), to induce them to delay their efforts to enter the UK paroxetine market independently of GSK, infringed the competition law prohibition on abuse of a dominant position."
The CMA imposed fine of 37,606,275 pounds ($54,581,747) on GSK. A fine of 5,841,286 pounds ($8,478,042) was imposed on Merck KGaA (GUK's former parent) and GUK. A fine of 1,542,860 pounds ($2,239,307) was imposed in respect of Alpharma's infringement.
Michael Grenfell, the CMA's enforcement director, said: "Today's decision sends out a strong message that we will tackle illegal behaviour that is designed to stifle competition at the expense of customers -- in this case, the NHS and, ultimately, taxpayers."
Seroxat was one of GSK's best-selling medicines and was used to treat, among other conditions, depression and anxiety disorders.
GSK and other companies were fined a total of 44.7 pound sterling or $65 million by the authority for anti-competitive conduct and agreements in relation to the supply of an anti-depressant drug, Xinhua reported.
The CMA said its decision relates to conduct and agreements between 2001 and 2004 in which GSK, the supplier of branded paroxetine (an anti-depressant medicine), agreed to make payments and other value transfers totalling over $72 million to suppliers of generic versions of the drug.
The CMA ruled the payments and other value transfers were aimed at delaying the potential entry of generic competitors into the British market for paroxetine.
The CMA said: "The CMA has also found that GSK's conduct, in making payments to GUK, Alpharma and one further company, Norton Healthcare Limited (IVAX), to induce them to delay their efforts to enter the UK paroxetine market independently of GSK, infringed the competition law prohibition on abuse of a dominant position."
The CMA imposed fine of 37,606,275 pounds ($54,581,747) on GSK. A fine of 5,841,286 pounds ($8,478,042) was imposed on Merck KGaA (GUK's former parent) and GUK. A fine of 1,542,860 pounds ($2,239,307) was imposed in respect of Alpharma's infringement.
Michael Grenfell, the CMA's enforcement director, said: "Today's decision sends out a strong message that we will tackle illegal behaviour that is designed to stifle competition at the expense of customers -- in this case, the NHS and, ultimately, taxpayers."
Seroxat was one of GSK's best-selling medicines and was used to treat, among other conditions, depression and anxiety disorders.
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.