No inspection beyond Day 1, randomisation software to decide which assessor will inspect which medical college

Computer-based selection of assessors:

MARB mentioned in the guidelines that in order to reduce human intervention, Robust Randomization Software will be used for the selection of the date of assessment and selection of assessors. Although the inspection will be a surprise, the list of medical colleges that will be assessed will be published on the NMC website.

It further clarified that all inspections (UG & PG courses) for a college will be conducted on the same day. For the UG course, the assessment will be conducted for one day by a team of 5 assessors (In case of non-availability of 5 assessors, MARB may allow inspection to be conducted by at least 3 assessors) and for PG courses, the assessment will be conducted for one day by a team of 2 assessors per specialty. (In case of non-availability of two assessor per specialty for the PG course, MARB may allow inspection to be conducted by one assessor).

NMC added that the team of assessors will conduct the assessment to examine the infrastructure, quality of medical education, faculty, AEBAS data, clinical indicators, and financial status of the college to ensure compliance with the latest NMC guidelines. The Assessment team may also conduct interviews with staff and all students during the assessment process.

The Commission has exempted the medical colleges established by the State/Central Government (recognized for MBBS for a period of 5 years), registered for additional PG seats from undergoing physical inspection, based on AEBAS data and other objective and numerically measurable parameters.

"Physical Inspection will be conducted for the application received for additional PG seats by private medical colleges. Physical inspection will also continue for Central/ State Government and Private Medical colleges applying for fresh PG seats and recognition of PG course," stated the guidelines.

As per the guidelines, after the inspection, the information will be collected and documented on the NMC portal by the assessor as per the latest assessor guidelines available on the Commission's website.

"It would be mandatory for the inspection team to ensure the duly signed & endorsed (by the college management) report is uploaded on the portal before inspection team departs from the hospital," MARB highlighted in the new guidelines.

Discouraging inspection beyond one day, NMC has allowed it in the rarest of rare cases only on account of force majeure. In all such cases, the same must be documented and immediately communicated to MARB and written approval must be sought for seeking any extension, the guidelines stated.

"In case of deficiencies being found, the same will be communicated to the medical college granting sufficient time to report compliance after rectification of the deficiencies. Following this surprise compliance verification inspection will be conducted in case of the establishment of new medical college / increase in admission capacity for UG courses," it further added.

The new guidelines released by NMC also include the format for the Essentiality Certificate, Format for Consent of Affiliation, Format for Consent of Affiliation for increase in seats, other formats for UG and PG assessment forms, review forms for UG and PG courses, UG scrutiny form, PG scrutiny format, and Assessor self-declaration form.

Also Read: NMC issues guidelines for assessment, rating of medical colleges from 2024-25 academic year, key takeaways

Medical Dialogues last year reported that professors and associate professors from Government Medical Colleges can be made Assessors and Experts of the National Medical Commission and at that time, the institutes are required to relieve them, the apex medical education regulatory body had announced and NMC asked for nominations from the institutes.