Jayalalithaa death probe: HC rejects plea by Apollo Hospital

Published On 2019-04-05 03:30 GMT   |   Update On 2019-04-05 03:30 GMT
Advertisement
The court found fault with the commission over the procedure adopted by it in filing an application before the panel through its own counsel and also the counter to Apollo Hospital.

Chennai: The Madras High Court Thursday rejected Apollo Hospital's objections to an inquiry commission set up to probe the death of late Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalithaa looking into aspects of treatment given to her.

Advertisement

As mandated by its terms of reference, the Justice A Arumughaswamy Commission of Inquiry was empowered and entitled to go into the appropriateness, efficacy, adequacy or inadequacy of the treatment given to Jayalalithaa during her 75-day hospitalisation in 2016, it said.


Read Also: Jayalalithaa Death Probe: HC reserves orders on Apollo Hospitals plea


A bench comprising Justices R Subbaih and Krishnan Ramasamy refused to stall the proceedings of the commission and disposed of the petition filed by the hospital seeking to quash the government orders which laid down the terms and reference of the probe panel.


It also rejected the prayer of the hospital for setting up a medical board to assist the panel during the inquiry.


The court found fault with the commission over the procedure adopted by it in filing an application before the panel through its own counsel and also the counter to Apollo Hospital.


Read Also: Jayalalithaa Death Probe: HC refuses to pass interim orders on Apollo Hospitals plea


The counter had observations alluding to collusion, conspiracy, inaction and inappropriate treatment against the hospital and the then state Health Secretary.


The bench said if a harmonious interpretation was made to the terms of reference, the government was careful enough to include the word "subsequent treatment provided till her unfortunate demise on December 5, 2016".


This meant the nature and extent of treatment given by Apollo Hospital, which includes appropriateness, adequacy or inadequacy of the treatment, the court said.


Read Also: Jayalalithaa Death Probe: Apollo Hospitals approaches High Court for stay


"We are of the view that if the commission is restrained from going into the correctness, efficacy, adequacy or inadequacy of the medical treatment provided by the petitioner hospital, it would only defeat the very object with which the government had appointed the commission of inquiry," it said.


Therefore, the panel can go into the correctness, efficacy, adequacy or inadequacy of the medical treatment provided by Apollo Hospital by screening the records produced before it and arrive at a conclusion, the bench said.


Read Also: Dismissed : Apollo Hospitals petition for medical board in Jayalalithaa Death probe


It disagreed with the hospital's contention that a retired judge of the high court (Arumughaswamy) cannot be the competent person to deal with the complex and intricate medical treatment and hence experts and professionals should be included in the panel.


Even in the absence of inclusion of experts or professionals, as per Section 5B of Commission of Inquiry Act, the commission can independently take the aid of any person who, in its opinion, shall be of assistance for conducting the inquiry.


Read Also: Panel probing Jayalalithaa death rejects Apollo Hospital plea for medical board


Referring to the hospital's charge that its doctors were repeatedly questioned and harassed, the bench said it was not inclined to accept the submissions that witnesses (doctors) were wantonly, willfully and deliberately harassed by the commission.


Though the commission had cast certain aspersions against the petitioner hospital, it will not vitiate the inquiry proceedings hitherto conducted, the court said expressing hope the panel will confine its inquiry strictly within the scope and ambit of terms of reference.


The government had set up the inquiry commission to look into the circumstances leading to the death of late AIADMK supremo on December 5, 2016, citing doubts expressed by various people.


Read Also: Panel Probing J Jayalalithaas Death Summons UK Doctor


 

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News