Doctors indemnity not for Hospital: SC

Published On 2021-12-27 05:15 GMT   |   Update On 2021-12-27 09:05 GMT

The Supreme Court has recently observed that if a hospital is not the beneficiary of the insurance policies, which have been obtained by doctors to cover the discharge of their own professional negligence, a joint and several liabilities could not be fastened on the insurer to cover the claims made to a hospital.Upholding the order of the NCDRC, the Apex court bench comprising of Justices...

Login or Register to read the full article

The Supreme Court has recently observed that if a hospital is not the beneficiary of the insurance policies, which have been obtained by doctors to cover the discharge of their own professional negligence, a joint and several liabilities could not be fastened on the insurer to cover the claims made to a hospital.

Upholding the order of the NCDRC, the Apex court bench comprising of Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna noted, "The hospital was not the beneficiary of the insurance policies which were obtained by the doctors to cover the discharge of their own professional obligations. There was a manifest error on the part of the District Forum as well as the State Commission. The NCDRC had a valid basis to exercise its revisional jurisdiction."

For more details, check out the full story on the link below:

Doctors Indemnity Not For Hospital: Supreme Court 



Tags:    

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News