NEET Protests: Rajya Sabha MP Moves SC Over Delhi Police's Facial Recognition

Written By :  Anshika Mishra
Published On 2026-07-29 12:30 GMT   |   Update On 2026-07-29 12:31 GMT
Advertisement

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi Police's use of facial recognition technology and biometric surveillance during the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)-linked protests over the NEET UG 2026 paper leak. Filed by Rajya Sabha MP A.A. Rahim, the petition seeks a declaration that the deployment of facial recognition and related surveillance measures against peaceful protesters is unconstitutional. It also urges the Court to direct authorities to immediately stop using such technology without a valid legal framework, reports The Hindu.

Advertisement

The petition alleges that since the protests began on July 20, thousands of protesters, journalists and bystanders have been subjected to continuous biometric surveillance through CCTV cameras, drones, mobile command vehicles and handheld devices. It claims the Delhi Police used facial recognition systems, including the “Ikshana” vehicle, “AjnaLens” smart glasses, and the “Abhigyan” mobile application linked to the National Automated Fingerprint Identification System. According to the plea, these measures were carried out without statutory backing, violated the right to privacy under Article 21, and exceeded the limited purposes for which such technologies were originally intended.

Full View
Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News