Medical Council report on medical negligence not above order of Consumer court, Supreme Court upholds Rs 9 Lakh compensation on Ophthalmologist

Published On 2024-03-13 12:14 GMT   |   Update On 2024-03-13 12:14 GMT

The Supreme Court bench recently observed that in a case of medical negligence, a report by the Medical Council, while relevant, cannot be determinative to contradict the factual findings made by a consumer forum.This observation was made by the Apex Court bench while considering a plea alleging medical negligence by an ophthalmologist and an Eye Clinic, based in Bardhaman, West Bengal. It...

Login or Register to read the full article

The Supreme Court bench recently observed that in a case of medical negligence, a report by the Medical Council, while relevant, cannot be determinative to contradict the factual findings made by a consumer forum.

This observation was made by the Apex Court bench while considering a plea alleging medical negligence by an ophthalmologist and an Eye Clinic, based in Bardhaman, West Bengal. It was alleged by the complainant that due to negligent cataract surgery by the doctor and the clinic, his 13-year-old boy lost complete vision in his right eye.

For more information click on the link below:



Tags:    

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News