Mere dissatisfaction of "expected" standard of care does not establish medical negligence: Delhi HC relief to Max Hospital

Published On 2024-12-31 12:04 GMT   |   Update On 2024-12-31 12:04 GMT

While dismissing the medical negligence claims against Max Super Speciality hospital doctors, the Delhi High Court recently observed that mere dissatisfaction or the assertion of an "expected" standard of care does not establish medical negligence.

Relying on the landmark judgment in the case of Bolam V. Friern Hospital Management Committee, the Court opined that the yardstick of medical negligence is whether the doctor's conduct and opinion fell below that of a reasonably competent practitioner in similar circumstances.

For more information, click on the link below:

Dissatisfaction with EXPECTED Standard of Care Does not Constitute Medical Negligence: Delhi HC relief to Max Hospital






Full View
Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News