Bhopal Gangrape: 2 Doctors Suspended, Senior Doctor, Medical Superintendent get Notice
Advertisement
Bhopal: An red-faced Madhya Pradesh administration has served suspended to two women doctors and sent a show-cause notice to a senior doctor over the medical examination report of the Bhopal gangrape victim which said the sexual act was committed "with her consent and will",
News18 reports that the dean of Gandhi Medical College has suspended Senior Residents Dr Khusbhu Gajbhiye and her colleague Dr Sanyogita while senior doctor Purnima was served the show-cause notice.
At one place, the report prepared by the doctors of the Sultania Lady Hospital also termed the 19-year-old woman as an "accused" instead of "victim".
Notwithstanding the doctors' claim of the errors having been committed "inadvertently", the Bhopal divisional commissioner served notices to them.According to police, the report, though containing the errors, confirmed that the woman was raped and injuries were found in her private parts.
The woman was allegedly raped by four men for almost three hours near the railway tracks in Bhopal when she was returning home after attending a coaching class on October 31 night.
"The doctors had written in the examination report that physical relation was established 'with her consent and will'. The report also mentioned the 'victim' as an 'accused' at one place," Superintendent of Police, Bhopal Railway Division, Ruchi Vardhan Mishra told PTI.
"When we sought clarification, the doctors concerned gave a (written) clarification that the word 'with' was inadvertently used instead of 'without'. Actually, the doctors wanted to say that the intercourse was done 'without her consent and will'. The other error terming the victim as an accused at one place was also rectified by the doctors in the clarification," she said.
Dr Khushbu, a PG Student, who has done only four medico-legal cases also blamed her inexperience for the error. “No one forced me to do the report, but I did not know how to write the report correctly, and my English is also weak,” she explained to Hindustan times on why she had written ‘accused’ when she meant ‘victim’.
Mishra said the errors in the report were "insignificant" as these were made in the column for recording the details of the incident. "In the doctors' examination report, the part relating to medical observation is significant," she added.
Divisional commissioner of Bhopal Ajatshatru, meanwhile, said that due to their mistake, the report could have been misconstrued.
"It was a sensitive issue and doctors should have avoided such inadvertent mistakes. So, the entire meaning of the report was misconstrued. We have served show cause notices to two doctors - Dr Khushbhu Gajbhiye and Dr Sanyogita asking them to furnish their replies within three days," Ajatshatru had earlier told PTI.
Meanwhile, News 18 reports Dr Karan Pipre, superintendent of the hospital, is already in trouble after he was seen laughing while briefing the media about the “botched-up” report. The daily reports Madhya Pradesh State Women’s Commission has summoned Pipre seeking an explanation.
Last week, the state police had suspended five policemen for their alleged negligence which led to delay in registering the offence. Two senior police officers-- the Inspector General of Police, Bhopal range, and SP concerned of the Government Railway Police, were transferreed.
The action came after media reports claimed it took the victim woman nearly 24 hours to get her complaint registered as officials of three police stations feuded over jurisdiction.
A case was finally registered on November 1, almost 24 hours after the crime, at the Government Railway Police (GRP) station at the Habibganj railway station.
Police have arrested all the four accused.
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.