Ceftobiprole noninferior to daptomycin for treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Written By :  Dr. Shravani Dali
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-10-07 04:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-07 06:52 GMT

Researchers have found in a new study that Ceftobiprole could be an important new option for the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin that may be effective for treating complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus.In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, adults...

Login or Register to read the full article

Researchers have found in a new study that Ceftobiprole could be an important new option for the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin that may be effective for treating complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, adults with complicated S. aureus bacteremia were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ceftobiprole at a dose of 500 mg intravenously every 6 hours for 8 days and every 8 hours thereafter, or daptomycin at a dose of 6 to 10 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 24 hours plus optional aztreonam (at the discretion of the trial-site investigators). The primary outcome, overall treatment success 70 days after randomization (defined as survival, bacteremia clearance, symptom improvement, no new S. aureus bacteremia–related complications, and no receipt of other potentially effective antibiotics), with a noninferiority margin of 15%, was adjudicated by a data review committee whose members were unaware of the trial-group assignments. Safety was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 390 patients who underwent randomization, 387 (189 in the ceftobiprole group and 198 in the daptomycin group) had confirmed S. aureus bacteremia and received ceftobiprole or daptomycin (modified intention-to-treat population). A total of 132 of 189 patients (69.8%) in the ceftobiprole group and 136 of 198 patients (68.7%) in the daptomycin group had overall treatment success (adjusted difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −7.1 to 11.1). Findings appeared to be consistent between the ceftobiprole and daptomycin groups in key subgroups and with respect to secondary outcomes, including mortality (9.0% and 9.1%, respectively; 95% CI, −6.2 to 5.2) and the percentage of patients with microbiologic eradication (82.0% and 77.3%; 95% CI, −2.9 to 13.0). Adverse events were reported in 121 of 191 patients (63.4%) who received ceftobiprole and 117 of 198 patients (59.1%) who received daptomycin; serious adverse events were reported in 36 patients (18.8%) and 45 patients (22.7%), respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (primarily mild nausea) were more frequent with ceftobiprole.

Ceftobiprole was noninferior to daptomycin with respect to overall treatment success in patients with complicated S. aureus bacteremia.

Reference:

Thomas L. Holland, M.D., Sara E. Cosgrove, M.D., Sarah B. Doernberg, M.D., Timothy C. Jenkins, M.D., Nicholas A. Turner, M.D., Helen W. Boucher, M.D., Oleksander Pavlov, M.D., Ivan Titov, M.D., Serhii Kosulnykov, M.D., Boyko Atanasov, M.D., Ivan Poromanski, M.D., Manana Makhviladze, M.D., et al., for the ERADICATE Study Group. Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Keywords:

Ceftobiprole, noninferior, daptomycin, treatment, complicated, Staphylococcus, aureus bacteremia, the new england journal of medicine,

Thomas L. Holland, M.D., Sara E. Cosgrove, M.D., Sarah B. Doernberg, M.D., Timothy C. Jenkins, M.D., Nicholas A. Turner, M.D., Helen W. Boucher, M.D., Oleksander Pavlov, M.D., Ivan Titov, M.D., Serhii Kosulnykov, M.D., Boyko Atanasov, M.D., Ivan Poromanski, M.D., Manana Makhviladze
Tags:    
Article Source : the new england journal of medicine

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News