COVID-19 vaccination does not adversely affect fertility, ovarian health: JAMA

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-06-22 05:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-06-22 11:18 GMT
Advertisement

USA: A recent study involving 2,200 women of child-bearing age did not find any link between COVID-19 vaccination and fertility and ovary health.

The findings, published in JAMA Network Open, showed that COVID-19 vaccination is not associated with changes in ovarian reserve by multiple biomarker assays of AMH (anti-Mullerian hormone) and sonographic AFC (antral follicle count), supporting previous studies on AMH.

Advertisement

Ovarian reserve is the ability of the ovary to produce eggs capable of fertilization resulting in a healthy, successful pregnancy. AMH is correlated with the ovarian pool, and AFC is measured during imaging of the ovaries during the menstrual cycle's follicular (egg-development) phase.

For the study, Liubin Yang, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, and colleagues retrospectively assessed levels of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH;974 patients) or sonographic antral follicle count (AFC; 1,222 patients) to evaluate ovarian reserve among women seen at the Texas Children's Family Fertility Center in Houston from January 4, 2016, to December 16, 2021.

The average age of the patients was 34 years. Nine hundred seventy-four women were assessed for AMH, out of which 836 weren't vaccinated against COVID-19, and 138 had received the Moderna (28), Pfizer/BioNTech (87 patients), Johnson & Johnson (9), or an unknown (14) vaccine. The average number of vaccine doses was 2.19, and post-vaccination AMH levels were measured four days to 1 year after receipt of the first dose.

The unvaccinated group was younger and had a lower average concentration of AMH but comparable median BMI (body mass index) and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, a marker of blood glucose) levels.

The authors reported the following findings:

· The AMH assay type significantly differed among vaccinated patients relative to the prevaccination group (31%) and the vaccinated cohort (99%) with the current assay.

· A linear regression model suggested that only age and AMH test type—not vaccination status—were tied to AMH value. 18% of patients showed no change in average AMH concentrations measured before and after COVID-19 vaccination.

· The median AFC value was 18 in the unvaccinated group and 20 in the postvaccination group. A linear regression model suggested that age and age-adjusted BMI—not vaccination status—were correlated with AFC level.

· A subgroup analysis of the vaccinated group adjusted for age, BMI, and HbA1c level showed that COVID-19 vaccination was tied to a higher AMH concentration (median, 3.3 vs 4.2 nanograms per millilitre), but the difference was not clinically significant.

"These findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccination is not associated with changes in ovarian reserve by multiple biomarker assays of AFC and AMH, supporting previous studies on AMH," the authors concluded. "On subgroup analysis, the AMH difference was not clinically significant."

Limitations of the study include the factors associated with an ovarian reserve that was not included in the study, the small number of patients who received a vaccination, and survival bias, as only patients who pursued fertility treatment were included. The authors also failed to capture outcomes among those who did not seek treatment.

Reference:

Yang L, Neal S, Lee T, Chou A, Schutt AK, Gibbons W. Comparison of Female Ovarian Reserve Before vs After COVID-19 Vaccination. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2318804. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18804


Tags:    
Article Source : JAMA Network Open

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News