GLP1 Receptor Agonists reduce VTE risk in Type 2 Diabetes, claims research
A recent groundbreaking study found that Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are effective in reducing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in type 2 diabetics regardless of their obesity status. The study results were presented at the Annual Meeting & Exposition of the American Society of Hematology.
Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are antihyperglycemic agents used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) which is a global pandemic. They are also prescribed for weight loss in obese patients. Research shows a consistent cardiovascular benefit with the use of GLP1-RA in T2DM. Previous studies have shown that GLP1-RA may reduce the thromboxane-induced platelet activation. As obesity is one of the risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) researchers hypothesized that GLP1-RA use may reduce the risk of VTE.
A retrospective, propensity score-matched multicenter database analysis was carried out using the TriNetX Analytics Network. Individuals with T2DM were taken for the study as diabetics use GLP1-RA. Individuals using oral anticoagulation, prior VTE, or a history of atrial fibrillation were excluded from the study.
Comparisons were done between patients who received GLP1-RA with those who received Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for achieving glycemic control. A subgroup analysis was also performed stratified by the presence of obesity. An individual was considered obese if they have a body mass index (BMI) 30 kg/m2. The primary outcome was incidence rate per 1000-patient years of all VTE at 1-year after the index date of first initiation of GLP1-RA or DPP-4 inhibitors. pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) measured individually were the secondary outcomes.
propensity-matching was done to patients (1:1) taking GLP1-RA with those on DPP-4 inhibitors based on predetermined clinical variables, including age, sex, race, BMI, hemoglobin A1c, use of other anti-diabetic agents including metformin and insulin, and underlying comorbidities. Charleston Comorbidity index was used for the propensity matching. a subgroup analysis was carried out as a secondary analysis stratified by the presence of obesity.
Findings:
- About 6,56,588 eligible patients who had T2DM were identified of whom 366,369 received GLP1-RA and 290,219 received DPP-4 inhibitors, respectively.
- Among patients with known BMI data, 62% of the patients were classified as obese with a BMI of 30kg/m2.
- Two cohorts ach having 168,428 patients were included in the final analysis who received GLP1-RA and DPP-4 inhibitors after propensity-score matching.
- Both cohorts were well balanced for demographics, hemoglobin A1c, BMI, other anti-diabetic drugs, and preexisting comorbidities.
- The mean HbA1c were 8.3 ± 2.0 and 8.3 ± 2.0, and the mean BMI was 33.3 ± 7.4 and 32.4 ± 7.1 for patients on GLP1-RA and DPP-4 inhibitors, respectively.
- The incidence of VTE was 11.0 events per 1000 patient-years in the GLP1-RA cohort vs. 12.9 in the DPP-4 inhibitor cohort indicating that GLP1-RA decreased the VTE.
- Patients who received GLP1-RA had an 18% lower risk of VTE than those who received DPP-4 inhibitors.
- Similarly, patients who received GLP1-RA had a lower risk of PE and DVT than those on DPP-4 inhibitors.
- In the subgroup analysis, similar differences in VTE rates were observed in patients with obesity and without obesity.
Thus, the study concluded that GLP1-RA reduces the risk of VTE and has a potential beyond glycemic control in individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes.
Further reading:
Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Reduce the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Diabetes Irrespective of Obesity: A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Database Analysis. Oral and Poster Abstracts. Poster No.701.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.