Recurrence of Gram-negative Bacterial Blood Stream Infections due to relapse not reinfection

Written By :  Dr.Niharika Harsha B
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-08-09 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-08-09 15:17 GMT
Advertisement

A recent investigation has revealed that relapse was the most common cause of recurrent Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI). The study was published in the journal, "Clinical Infectious Diseases."  

As there is not much understanding of the causes and clinical characteristics of recurrent gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNB-BSI), researchers from the U.S.A. conducted a study to understand the recurrence pattern of the GNB-BSI. A prospective study was conducted on patients with GNB-BSI to identify clinical characteristics, microbiology, and risk factors associated with these recurrent infections. Bacterial genotyping which included both pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [PFGE] and whole genome sequencing [WGS] was used to define whether these episodes were due to relapse or reinfection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with recurrence. 

Advertisement

Results: 

1423 patients with GNB-BSI met the criteria for inclusion in this study. 

Of these 60 (4%) had recurrent GNB-BSI.

Non-white race, admission to a surgical service, and presence of an indwelling cardiac device were associated with increased risk for recurrent GNB-BSI.

63% were due to relapse (30/48) and 38% were due to reinfection (18/48) based on WGS, among the 48 patients with recurrent GNB-BSI whose paired bloodstream isolates underwent genotyping, 

PFGE correctly differentiated relapse and reinfection in 98% (47/48) of cases compared with WGS.

The median time to relapse and reinfection was similar (113 days vs. 174 days).

The presence of a cardiac device was associated with relapse. 

Thus, the researchers concluded that relapse was the most common cause of recurrent GNB-BSI, and the presence of a cardiac device was a risk factor for relapse. They also found that PFGE was more accurate in differentiating relapse from reinfection when compared with WGS. 

To read the full article, click here: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac638

 Bock A, Hanson BM, Ruffin F, et al. Clinical and Molecular Analysis of Recurrent Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections [published online ahead of print, 2022 Aug 5]. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;ciac638. 

Tags:    
Article Source : Clinical Infectious Diseases

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News