Denosumab Linked to Higher Risk of Severe Hypocalcemia in Older Female Dialysis-Dependent Patients: JAMA

For this purpose, the researchers conducted a retrospective cohort study of female dialysis-dependent Medicare patients aged 65 or older who began treatment with denosumab or oral bisphosphonates between 2013 and 2020. Clinical data, including monthly serum calcium levels, were obtained through the Consolidated Renal Operations in a Web-Enabled Network database.

Severe hypocalcemia was defined as serum calcium below 7.5 mg/dL or emergent care for hypocalcemia. Very severe hypocalcemia was also assessed. The study calculated cumulative incidence and risk differences during the first 12 weeks of treatment.

Based on the study, the researchers reported the following findings:

• In the unweighted cohorts, 607 of 1523 denosumab-treated patients and 23 of 1281 oral bisphosphonate-treated patients developed severe hypocalcemia.
• The 12-week weighted cumulative incidence of severe hypocalcemia was 41.1% for denosumab versus 2.0% for oral bisphosphonates (weighted risk difference, 39.1%; weighted risk ratio, 20.7).
• The 12-week weighted cumulative incidence of very severe hypocalcemia was higher with denosumab (10.9%) versus oral bisphosphonates (0.4%) (weighted risk difference, 10.5%; weighted risk ratio, 26.4)

This study found a higher incidence of severe and very severe hypocalcemia following denosumab initiation compared to oral bisphosphonates in dialysis-dependent patients treated for osteoporosis. The risk was particularly elevated in patients with mild to moderate hypocalcemia at baseline.

"Due to the challenges of diagnosing underlying bone pathophysiology in this population, the high risk associated with denosumab, and the complex monitoring and treatment strategies required for severe hypocalcemia, denosumab should be used cautiously, with careful patient selection and frequent monitoring," the researchers concluded.

Reference:

Bird ST, Smith ER, Gelperin K, et al. Severe Hypocalcemia With Denosumab Among Older Female Dialysis-Dependent Patients. JAMA. 2024;331(6):491–499. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.28239