Lower-Dose Immunosuppression Equally Effective in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: Study

Written By :  Dr Riya Dave
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2025-11-16 15:30 GMT   |   Update On 2025-11-16 15:30 GMT
Advertisement

The OPTIMIZE trial found that adults aged 65 and older had similar rates of successful kidney transplantation when treated with a lower-dose immunosuppression regimen compared to standard dosing. The study was published in the Journal of The American Scociety of Nephrology by Sanders and colleagues.

Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, even in older adults. However, balancing immunosuppression against the risk of drug-related toxicity to prevent graft rejection remains a challenge in this population. A hypothesis has been raised that with reduced immune responsiveness accompanying aging, older recipients may benefit from lower immunosuppressive exposure. The OPTIMIZE study tested whether a regimen combining low-dose tacrolimus with everolimus and prednisolone might improve long-term graft and patient outcomes compared with standard-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone.

Advertisement

The OPTIMIZE trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study that enrolled kidney transplant recipients who were aged 65 years or older. Of 379 patients, 198 were randomized to stratum A (recipients of kidneys from deceased donors older than 65 years) and 181 to stratum B (recipients of kidneys from younger deceased or living donors). Participants were assigned either to the TEP group (low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, prednisolone) or to the TMP group (standard-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisolone).

In the TEP group, tacrolimus trough levels were maintained at 5–7 ng/mL until 3 months, 2–4 ng/mL from 3–6 months, and 1.5–4 ng/mL thereafter. The respective trough levels for these time frames in the TMP group were 8–12 ng/mL, 6–10 ng/mL, and 5–8 ng/mL. Successful transplantation was defined as being alive with a functioning graft and an eGFR above 30 mL/min/1.73m² (for stratum A) or 45 mL/min/1.73m² (for stratum B) at 2 years post-transplantation.

Results

  • No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 arms in successful transplantation rates.

  • By 2 years, successful transplantation was achieved by 50% (n=94) of patients in the TEP group and 57% (n=110) in the TMP group (difference 7%; 95% CI, −17 to 3; P=0.91).

  • In fact, patient survival was almost exactly comparable, with 89% (n=167) in the TEP group versus 89% (n=171) in the TMP group (P=0.95).

  • Graft survival was similarly not significantly different, seen in 83% (n=155) for the TEP group and 84% (n=162) for the TMP group (P=0.65).

  • In addition, there were no significant differences observed in any major endpoint in stratified analysis based on donor age: strata A and B.

The OPTIMIZE trial concluded that immunosuppression with low-dose tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisolone did not result in superior success of transplantation, kidney function, or survival compared to a standard-dose tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone regimen. Researchers emphasize that standard immunosuppressive regimens remain appropriate for elderly kidney transplant recipients, since reduced tacrolimus dosing confers no additional clinical benefit.

Reference:

Sanders, Jan-Stephan F.1; de Boer, Silke E.1; Jonker, Jip1; Bemelman, Frederike J.2; Betjes, Michiel G.H.3; de Vries, Aiko P.J.4; Hilbrands, Luuk5; Hilhorst, Marc2; Kuypers, Dirk R.J.6; Vart, Priya1; van Zuilen, Arjan D.7; Hesselink, Dennis A.3; Berger, Stefan P.1. Immunosuppression in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology ():10.1681/ASN.0000000924, November 7, 2025. | DOI: 10.1681/ASN.0000000924



Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of The American Scociety of Nephrology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News