Single-use versus reusable ureteroscopes yield similar outcomes in intrarenal surgery for urinary stones: Study

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-03-06 19:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-03-06 19:30 GMT
Advertisement

Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis published in Urolithiasis compared the performance of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscopes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for urinary stones.

The researchers found that both scopes demonstrated similar outcomes in operative time, stone-free rates, incidence of post-operative fever, and UTIs. The results indicate that the choice between the two hinges on factors, such as cost, availability, and surgeon preference.

Advertisement

Flexible ureterolithotripsy is a frequent urological procedure, usually used for stone removal from the kidney and upper ureter. For that procedure, reusable uretero-scopes were the standard tool, but recent concerns regarding sterility and maintenance and repair costs created the opportunity to develop new technologies.

The first single-use digital flexible ureteroscope was introduced in 2016. Since then, other single-use ureteroscopes have been developed, and studies compared them with reusable ureteroscopes and yielded conflicting results. Therefore, Mikhael Belkovsky, Surgical Technique & Experimental Surgery Department, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, and colleagues aimed to describe the literature that compares the performance of single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscopes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for urinary stones.

For this purpose, the researchers performed a systematic review in October 2022 according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses) and Cochrane Handbook. A search in online databases retrieved 10,039 articles. After screening, twelve articles were selected for the Meta-Analysis.

Based on the review, the researchers reported the following findings:

  • No differences were found in stone-free rate (OR 1.31), operative time (MD 0.12), incidence of post-operative fever (OR 0.64), or incidence of post-operative urinary tract infection (OR 0.63 ).
  • No differences were observed in the studied variables.

In conclusion, both scopes demonstrated comparable outcomes in operative time, stone-free rates, the incidence of postoperative fever, and UTIs.

"Hence, the device choice should rely on the cost analysis, availability, and surgeons' preference," the researchers wrote.

Reference:

Belkovsky M, Passerotti CC, Maia RS, de Almeida Artifon EL, Otoch JP, Da Cruz JAS. Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 28;52(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01537-8. PMID: 38413490.


Tags:    
Article Source : Urolithiasis journal

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News