Vascular Sound Index Shows Promise in Detecting Hemodialysis Access Stenosis: Study
Written By : Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By : Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2026-03-13 16:00 GMT | Update On 2026-03-13 16:00 GMT
Japan: Early detection of vascular access (VA) stenosis remains essential for patients undergoing hemodialysis, as untreated narrowing can compromise dialysis efficiency and lead to access failure.
A new study published in BMC Nephrology suggests that the Hemodialysis Vascular Sound Index (HVSI), a noninvasive tool based on vascular sound analysis, may serve as a practical screening method to identify patients who require confirmatory ultrasound or vascular access intervention.
Ultrasound (US) is widely regarded as the gold standard for detecting VA stenosis because of its high diagnostic accuracy. However, routine use can be limited by the need for specialized equipment and trained personnel. Yasumasa Hitomi from the Division of Clinical Engineering at Tojinkai Hospital, Kyoto, and colleagues explored whether HVSI—calculated from vascular murmur recordings—could provide a simpler, objective alternative to help triage patients at risk.
In this prospective matched observational study, 202 hemodialysis patients were enrolled. The study group included 101 individuals with clinically significant stenosis requiring vascular access interventional treatment (VAIVT), while the control group comprised 101 stable patients with no significant stenosis confirmed by ultrasound. Participants were matched using propensity scores based on age, sex, dialysis duration, diabetes status, dialysis adequacy (Kt/V), and laboratory parameters.
HVSI measurements were obtained before dialysis using an electronic stethoscope positioned over the vascular anastomosis. Doppler ultrasound was used to assess brachial artery flow volume (FV) and resistance index (RI). The diagnostic performance of HVSI was analyzed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). An additional small verification cohort of 20 patients was included to evaluate the reproducibility of predefined HVSI thresholds.
The study revealed the following findings:
- HVSI showed a strong positive correlation with brachial artery flow volume (R² = 0.58).
- A moderate inverse correlation was observed between HVSI and resistance index (R² = 0.32).
- For detecting reduced flow volume at thresholds of ≤500, ≤400, and ≤350 mL/min, HVSI demonstrated sensitivities ranging from 86.3% to 94.4%.
- Specificities for these thresholds ranged between 78.7% and 82.9%.
- The area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.90 to 0.94, reflecting high diagnostic accuracy.
- Diagnostic performance was generally superior in non-bifurcated vascular structures.
- In the verification cohort, predefined HVSI cutoffs maintained high specificity for identifying flow volumes below 400 mL/min.
- The HVSI thresholds also showed strong concordance in identifying patients who required vascular access interventional treatment.
While the findings support HVSI as a promising adjunctive screening tool, the authors caution that the matched case-control design may overstate diagnostic accuracy compared with real-world screening settings. They emphasize that HVSI should complement—not replace—vascular ultrasound. Larger studies involving consecutively enrolled patients are needed to confirm generalizability and refine its clinical application.
Reference:
Hitomi, Y., Suzuki, N., Enmeiji, T. et al. Hemodialysis vascular sound index as a diagnostic tool for vascular access stenosis: a prospective matched observational study. BMC Nephrol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-04815-2
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.