Case of Guillain-Barre syndrome reported after COVID 19 Vaccination- a report
A recent case report demonstrated a patient who developed Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) in the 19 Vaccine trial. The case report also recorded an additional incidence of GBS in the placebo group of the trial. However, the clinicians reported no causal relationship between the event and the COVID 19 vaccine. They further noted that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of COVID-19 infection and associated morbidity and mortality. The case report was published in the journal Neurology on April 06, 2021.
There are reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and cranial neuropathies occurring during or shortly after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, a recent epidemiological-cohort study found no evidence for causality between COVID-19 and GBS. In this case report, the authors reported a case of a 60-year-old woman who developed GBS after vaccination and explained why this case cannot be used to establish a causal association between vaccination and the onset of GBS.
Details of the case:
The authors explained about a 60-year-old woman with a history of migraines, received the Johnson & Johnson one-dose vaccine in December 2020. During the screening process, she was tested negative for SARS-CoV-2, and she had no respiratory or gastrointestinal illness at the start of the trial. Ten days after receiving the vaccine, she developed pain in the back and legs and was eventually unable to move either, with a study visit four days after symptom onset, on December 24, confirming a negative PCR assay for COVID-19. The day after, she was presented with headache, nausea, vomiting, and diplopia. She was admitted to the hospital and received a neurological examination and overnight treatment for migraine. As the headache and diplopia persisted after discharge, and she was readmitted on December 27.
Upon examination, the clinicians noted left eye esotropia on midline gaze and bilateral ocular abduction deficits but, the strength, sensation, and reflexes in her limbs were normal. Symptoms progressed to bilateral facial weakness and numbness the next day, accompanied by areflexia and 2/5 weakness of both legs. The clinicians conducted an MRI and lumbar puncture, along with needle electromyography and electrophysiologic studies. Lumbar puncture revealed an increased opening pressure (29 cm H2O), elevated CSF protein (140 mg/dL), nine nucleated cells, and normal glucose (63 mg/dL). Nerve conduction studies two days after admission showed normal compound muscle action potentials and sensory nerve action potentials. Peroneal and posterior tibialis F-waves and H-reflexes were absent. Needle electromyography showed neurogenic recruitment in leg muscles. Antiganglioside antibodies were negative. RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 was repeated twice during admission and resulted in negative.
The clinicians then administered intravenous immunoglobulin 2g/kg over 2days starting on December 29, 2020. Her strength improved slowly, and she was discharged to rehabilitation 10days after admission.
Dr Alejandra M Márquez Loza wrote, "The fact that one other participant in the Johnson & Johnson vaccine trial also developed GBS 10 days after being injected with placebo supports the argument for a coincidental rather than a causal association."
They advised neurologists to reassure their patients, the public, and policymakers regarding the safety and rationale of COVID-19 vaccinations as more reports of GBS and other autoimmune diseases will likely emerge.
The authors concluded, "Based on experience with other vaccination initiatives and the data in the adverse monitoring systems of the COVID-19 vaccines gathered so far, we are certain that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of COVID-19 infection and associated morbidity and mortality."
They further added, "We also advise our patients with prior GBS that there is no contraindication to receiving any COVID-19 vaccination and that they should get vaccinated as soon as they can."
For further information:
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.