Botulinum Neurotoxin for Treating Blepharospasm, Cervical Dystonia, Adult Spasticity, and Headache: AAN Guideline

Written By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2022-11-10 04:30 GMT   |   Update On 2022-11-10 09:09 GMT

American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has released guidelines on Botulinum Neurotoxin for the Treatment of Blepharospasm, Cervical Dystonia, Adult Spasticity, and Headache in April 2016 and reaffirmed April 30, 2022. Endorsed by the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.Following are its major recommendations:1....

Login or Register to read the full article

American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has released guidelines on Botulinum Neurotoxin for the Treatment of Blepharospasm, Cervical Dystonia, Adult Spasticity, and Headache in April 2016 and reaffirmed April 30, 2022. Endorsed by the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Following are its major recommendations:

1. OnaBoNT-A and incoBoNT-A injections should be considered as treatment options for blepharospasm (Level B).

2. Weak Evidence AboBoNT-A may be considered as a treatment option for blepharospasm (Level C).

3. AboBoNT-A and rimaBoNT-B should be offered (Level A) as options for the treatment of CD.

4. OnaBoNT-A and incoBoNT-A should be considered (Level B) as options for the treatment of CD.

5. For focal manifestations of adult spasticity involving the upper limb, aboBoNT-A, incoBoNT-A, and onaBoNT-A should be offered (Level A) as treatment options.*

6. For focal manifestations of adult spasticity involving the upper limb, rimaBoNT-B should be considered (Level B) as a treatment option.* 

7. For focal manifestations of adult spasticity involving the lower limb that warrant treatment, onaBoNT-A and aboBoNT-A should be offered (Level A) as treatment options.*

8. There is insufficient evidence to support or refute a benefit of incoBoNT-A or rimaBoNT-B for treatment of adult lower limb spasticity (Level U). 

9. OnaBoNT-A should be considered as a treatment option before tizanidine (TZD) for treating adult upper extremity spasticity (Level B).

10. Both high-volume, low-potency injections of onaBoNT-A and endplate targeting of onaBoNT-A into proximal upper extremity muscles should be considered to enhance tone reduction in spasticity (Level B). 

11. OnaBoNT-A should be offered as a treatment option to patients with CM to increase the number of headache-free days (Level A).

12. OnaBoNT-A should be considered to reduce headache impact on health-related quality of life (Level B).

13. OnaBoNT-A should not be offered as a treatment for episodic migraine (Level A). Tension-type Headaches

14. No new studies were identified that would have changed the conclusion of the 2008 guideline.3 BoNT injection is probably ineffective for treating chronic tension-type headaches (two Class I studies) (Level B, as determined in 2008 guideline).

Reference:

David M. Simpson, Mark Hallett, Eric J. Ashman, Cynthia L. Comella, Mark W. Green, Gary S. Gronseth, Melissa J. Armstrong, David Gloss, Sonja Potrebic, Joseph Jankovic, Barbara P. Karp, Markus Naumann, Yuen T. So, Stuart A. Yablon Neurology May 2016, 86 (19) 1818-1826; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002560

Tags:    
Article Source : American Academy of Neurology,AAN

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News