EEG-Based Brain Age Index promising Predictor of Dementia Risk: JAMA
A meta-analysis across five cohorts has found that an EEG-derived brain age index, based on sleep microstructures, can predict dementia risk. Each 10-year increase in this index was associated with a 39% higher risk of dementia. The findings suggest that this index has promising predictive value, though further evaluation is needed.
Microstructures of sleep electroencephalography (EEG) are closely related to cognition and undergo age-dependent changes. However, their multidimensional nature makes them challenging to interpret using conventional approaches. The machine learning–based EEG brain age index (BAI) measures the deviation between sleep EEG-based brain age and chronological age.
A study was done to determine the association between sleep BAI and incident dementia in community-dwelling populations. For this individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis, sleep study data from 5 community-based longitudinal cohorts were pooled. These cohorts included the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA; 2010-2013), the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study (1987-1989), the Framingham Heart Study–Offspring Study (FHS-OS; 1995-1998), the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS; 2003-2005), and the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF; 2002-2004). The BAI was computed using interpretable machine learning, incorporating sleep EEG features extracted from central channels in overnight, home-based polysomnography. Fine-Gray models were used to assess the association between BAI and incident dementia within each cohort, accounting for death as a competing risk. Cohort-specific estimates were then pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Analyses were performed between March 2024 and September 2025.
This meta-analysis included 7105 participants from the MESA (n = 1802; mean [SD] age, 69.3 [9.0] years; 956 females [53.1%]), ARIC (n = 1796; 62.5 [5.7] years; 918 females [51.1%]), FHS-OS (n = 617; 59.5 [8.9] years; 318 females [51.5%]), MrOS (n = 2639 males [100%]; 76.0 [5.3] years), and SOF (n = 251 females [100%]; 82.7 [2.9] years) cohorts. The median (IQR) time to dementia was 4.8 (4.2-5.6) years in the MESA cohort (n = 119 [6.6%]), 16.9 (14.9-19.8) years in the ARIC cohort (n = 354 [19.7%]), 13.1 (8.5-16.2) years in the FHS-OS cohort (n = 59 [9.6%]), 3.6 (1.3-7.1) years in the MrOS cohort (n = 470 [17.8%]), and 4.6 (4.2-5.2) years in the SOF cohort (n = 86 [34.3%]). Across the cohorts, each 10-year increase in BAI was associated with a 39% higher risk of incident dementia (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.21-1.59]; P < .001) after adjustment for covariates. These associations remained after additional adjustment for comorbidities and apnea-hypopnea index scores (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14-1.50]; P < .001) and apolipoprotein E ε4 (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.02-1.45]; P = .03), and they were consistent across sex and age groups.
In this IPD meta-analysis, a higher sleep EEG-based BAI was associated with a higher risk of incident dementia. These findings highlight the need to evaluate the predictive value of the BAI as a noninvasive digital marker for early detection of dementia in community settings.
Reference:
Sun H, Milton S, Fang Y, et al. Machine Learning–Based Sleep Electroencephalographic Brain Age Index and Dementia Risk: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2026;9(3):e261521. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.1521
Keywords:
EEG-Based, Brain Age, Index, promising, Predictor, Dementia Risk, JAMA, Sun H, Milton S, Fang Y
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.