Endovascular Thrombectomy may Yield Long-Term Benefits for Large Infarct Stroke Patients: Lancet
Researchers in a recent study indicated that endovascular thrombectomy offered long-term benefits to acute ischemic stroke patients having large vessel occlusion and large infarct. As per the 12-month follow-up analysis for the TENSION trial, prominent, lasting improvements in functional outcomes, quality of life, and overall survival were noted for acute ischemic attack patients due to large vessel occlusion. The findings were published in theResearchers in a recent study indicated that endovascular thrombectomy offered long-term benefits to acute ischemic stroke patients having large vessel occlusion and large infarct. As per the 12-month follow-up analysis for the TENSION trial, prominent, lasting improvements in functional outcomes, quality of life, and overall survival were noted for acute ischemic attack patients due to large vessel occlusion. The findings were published in the Lancet Neurology journal by Prof. Gotz Thomalla and colleagues.
The challenge persists in the management of chronic stroke, especially in patients with large infarcts. Endovascular thrombectomy had certain promising early results in recent studies, but long-term data has been scant. TENSION trailed this gap, examining for safety and effectiveness, up to 12 months, endovascular thrombectomy in patients with large infarcts.
The TENSION trial was an open-label, blinded endpoint randomized trial conducted in 40 hospitals in Europe and one in Canada. The patients were 18 years or older with acute ischemic anterior circulation stroke, large vessel occlusion identified by an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic Score of 3-5. Patients were randomly assigned to receive endovascular thrombectomy and medical treatment versus medical treatment alone within 12 hours of stroke onset.
The primary outcome was the functional outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. The 12-month follow-up included assessments of functional outcome, quality of life (using PROMIS-10 and EQ-5D questionnaires), post-stroke anxiety and depression (using PHQ-4), and overall survival.
Results
The trial randomized 253 patients from July 17, 2018, to February 21, 2023, when it was stopped because of demonstrated efficacy. Of those, 125 (49%) received endovascular thrombectomy with 128 (51%) receiving medical treatment only. Median follow-up time was 8.36 months.
The key findings at 12 months were:
• On the modified Rankin Scale, endovascular thrombectomy showed better functional outcomes; the common odds ratio after adjustment was 2.39 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.47 to 3.90.
• Scores on quality of life were better in the thrombectomy group, with a median 0.7 EQ-5D index score and an IQR of 0.4 to 0.9, compared with 0.4, IQR 0.2-0.7, for those who had medical treatment.
• Health status on the EQ-5D visual analogue scale was 50 (IQR, 35-70) versus 30 (IQR, 5-60), and PROMIS-10 global physical health scores were 39.8 (IQR, 37.4-50.8) versus 37.4 (IQR, 32.4-44.9).
• There was no significant difference in global mental health scores on PROMIS-10 (41.1 [IQR, 36.3-48.3] vs. 38.8 [IQR, 31.3-44.7]).
• Anxiety and depression were reported by 22% and 31% of thrombectomy patients, respectively, compared to 42% and 50% in the medical treatment group.
• Survival was slightly better in the thrombectomy group, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.50-0.99).
Results from the TENSION trial show that very long-term benefits of endovascular thrombectomy exist in patients with large infarcts from acute ischemic stroke. There were major improvements in functional and quality-of-life outcomes and survival, which underpin the use of thrombectomy in this patient group. However, no significant difference was observed in the mental health outcome, and it seems that further interventions might be needed in respect to anxiety and depression following a stroke.
Reference:
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.