Glibenclamide, a drug targeting cerebral edema, did not improve functional outcome in severe stroke patients: Study

Intravenous glibenclamide, a drug capable of reducing cerebral edema, did not improve functional outcome at three months in patients with large hemispheric infarction, a new study shows. The international randomised controlled trial did however confirm that the drug is safe and that there may be a beneficial signal in less severely affected stroke patients.

The CHARM study, presented today at the European Stroke Organisation Conference (ESOC) 2024, was a global, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 141 hospitals. Patients who presented with large hemispheric infarction within 10 hours of last seen well were randomised to intravenous glibenclamide or placebo. The researchers primarily focused on the functional outcomes in both groups at three months, but also studied safety outcomes.

The group of patients who received intravenous glibenclamide (n=217 patients) did not have a lower likelihood of a poor functional outcome (common odds ratio [OR] 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80, 1.71) at three months, when compared to placebo (n=214 patients). The rates of serious adverse events were high in both groups, consistent with critical illness of the large stroke population.

Dr. W. Taylor Kimberly, one of the lead investigators on the study, from Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, believes there is reason for optimism following CHARM. “We have learned a lot about glibenclamide during our 14-year journey from bench to bedside. When it comes to large hemispheric infarctions, we have wondered about a ceiling effect. How big a stroke is too big? Although we must be cautious in interpreting subgroup analyses, we have seen some promising signals in patients with medium-large stroke volumes (80-130 mL).”