High-dose biotin does not significantly improve multiple sclerosis: Lancet

Written By :  Medha Baranwal
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2020-11-03 12:28 GMT   |   Update On 2020-11-04 06:55 GMT

USA: The use of MD1003, a high-dose of pharmaceutical-grade biotin, did not help in significant improvement of walking speed or disability in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), according to findings from phase III SPI2 trial. The findings, published in the journal Lancet Neurology, suggest that MD1003 cannot be recommended for progressive MS treatment.

There is an increasing need for therapeutic options directed at neurodegeneration that is responsible for progression in MS. MD1003 migh help in enhancing neuronal and oligodendrocyte energetics resulting in improved cell repair, function, or survival. 

The previous MS-SPI -- randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study -- found that MD1003 improved disability outcomes over 12 months in progressive MS patients. The SPI2 study by Prof Bruce A C Cree, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA, and colleagues, was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of MD1003 in progressive forms of multiple sclerosis in a larger, more representative patient cohort. 

SPI2, a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial, was performed at 90 academic and community multiple sclerosis clinics across 13 countries. It included 642 patients aged 18–65 years and having a diagnosis of primary or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis fulfilling the revised International Panel criteria and Lublin criteria, a Kurtzke pyramidal functional subscore of at least 2 (defined as minimal disability), an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of 3·5–6·5, a timed 25-foot walk (TW25) of less than 40 s, evidence of clinical disability progression, and no relapses in the 2 years before enrolment.

326 participants received MD1003 (oral biotin 100 mg three times daily) and 316 received placebo.The primary endpoint was a composite of the proportion of participants with confirmed improvement in EDSS or TW25 at month 12, confirmed at month 15, versus baseline. The double-blind, placebo-controlled phase of the study ended when the primary endpoint for the last-entered participant was assessed on Nov 15, 2019. 

Key findings of the study include:

  • The mean time in the placebo-controlled phase was 20·1 months.
  • For the primary outcome, 12% of 326 patients in the MD1003 group compared with 9% of 316 in the placebo group improved at month 12, with confirmation at month 15 (odds ratio 1·35).
  • Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 84% of 331 participants in the MD1003 group and in 85% of 311 in the placebo group.
  • 26% of 331 participants in the MD1003 group and 26% of 311 participants in the placebo group had at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event.
  • One (<1%) person died in the MD1003 group and there were no deaths in the placebo group.
  • Despite use of mitigation strategies, MD1003 led to inaccurate laboratory results for tests using biotinylated antibodies.

"In addition to the potential of MD1003 for deleterious health consequences from interference of laboratory tests, MD1003 cannot be recommended for treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis," concluded the authors.

"Safety and efficacy of MD1003 (high-dose biotin) in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (SPI2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial," is published in the journal Lancet Neurology.

DOI: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(20)30347-1/fulltext

Tags:    
Article Source : Lancet Neurology

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News