Intravenous Thrombolysis feasible proposition for Central retinal artery occlusion

Written By :  Dr.Niharika Harsha B
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-01-31 23:30 GMT   |   Update On 2024-01-31 23:30 GMT
Advertisement

In a groundbreaking study conducted at a comprehensive stroke center, researchers have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of an emergency treatment protocol utilizing intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for patients suffering from Central Retinal Artery Occlusion (CRAO). The study, conducted over a span of four years, sheds light on using Intravenous thrombolysis as a potential breakthrough in addressing acute vision loss due to retinal strokes.

Advertisement

The study results were published in the Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.  

Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion (CRAO), an ischemic stroke causing sudden blindness, has a low functional visual recovery rate. Despite lacking established therapies, recent suggestions propose intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) after a risk-benefit discussion. While randomized trials are scarce, observational studies hint at potential benefits. Hence researchers conducted a study examining time to presentation, triage, eligibility rates, and potential risks associated with IVT in acute CRAO at a comprehensive stroke center.  

The retrospective, observational cohort study included 36 patients with acute CRAO, emphasizing the need for urgent intervention. The patients, with a mean age of 70.7 years and a balanced gender distribution (52% female), were evaluated based on specific criteria. IVT was offered to those presenting with acute vision loss of ≤ 20/200 in the affected eye, after ruling out alternative causes through a comprehensive ophthalmologic exam. The criteria for IVT closely resembled those used for acute ischemic strokes, underscoring the urgency of intervention.

Findings: ·        

  • One of the key findings of the study highlighted the temporal aspect of patient presentations. ·        
  • Patients within the crucial 4.5-hour window from symptom onset were more likely to directly present to the emergency department (66.6% vs. 37.1%, p = 0.1). ·        
  • However, only 25% of the patients fell within this time frame, indicating the need for heightened efforts in rapid triage to emergency departments for potential IVT candidates. ·        
  • Of the eligible patients, an encouraging 77% received IVT, demonstrating a high rate of treatment success. ·        
  • Remarkably, there were no reported instances of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or extracranial hemorrhage, indicating the safety and efficacy of the IVT protocol for CRAO.

While the study represents a significant step forward in addressing retinal strokes, it also underscores the importance of continued educational initiatives. The fact that 75% of patients presented outside the 4.5-hour treatment window emphasizes the need for enhanced awareness and education to facilitate prompt triage to emergency departments. This breakthrough offers new possibilities for the field of ophthalmology and stroke management, providing a potential lifeline for those experiencing retinal strokes. As the research continues to evolve, the study serves as a beacon of hope, encouraging further exploration and refinement of emergency treatment protocols for retinal artery occlusions.

Further reading: IV Thrombolysis for Central retinal artery occlusion – real-world experience from a Comprehensive Stroke Center. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107610

Tags:    
Article Source : Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News