Late-line treatment with Bevacizumab alone or in combination with Chemotherapy beneficial in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma
Bevacizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy could be beneficial as a late-line therapy in a subset of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. A recent study published in Acta Neurochirurgica showed that small 2D tumour size in post-contrast T1 weighted MRI at bevacizumab initiation was independently associated with prolonged time to progression.
High-grade gliomas are the most common primary malignant tumors of the central nervous system. They are characterized by a heterogeneous infiltrating nature that makes their management challenging with poor treatment outcomes. Standard treatment has been established for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas. Besides concurrent chemo-radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ), the addition of tumour-treating fields to maintenance chemotherapy with temozolomide has shown a moderate improvement in survival compared to temozolomide alone, and the lomustine-temozolomide combination confers a survival advantage in patients with tumors exhibiting O6-methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation.
Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets tumor neo-angiogenesis through circulating anti-VEGF action. This treatment has been widely used for various oncological pathologies, including high-grade gliomas. Two randomized clinical trials have evaluated bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastomas in addition to standard therapy. Despite an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), these trials failed to demonstrate any significant improvement in overall survival (OS).
Yahia-Cherie et al conducted a retrospective study, where they found a response rate of 45.2% and a PFS at 6 months of 34.3% among the 31 patients treated with bevacizumab as a late-line treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas. An 18-studies’ meta-analysis evaluated bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastomas and found a response rate of 19 to 85% and a 6-month PFS of 17 to 65%.
In their study, they analyzed patients who had a sustained response to bevacizumab (PFS ≥ 6 months). A high proportion of long-term responders had methylated MGMT tumors, exhibited 11C-MET-PET response, and were more likely to have a smaller 2D tumor size at treatment initiation. A multicenter retrospective study evaluated predicting factors of long-term bevacizumab response in recurrent glioblastomas, and 8% of patients had a PFS ≥ 12 months and were considered long responders. Among the factors evaluated, steroids at bevacizumab initiation, the delay between the last chemotherapy and the initiation of bevacizumab, and radiotherapy at recurrence were associated with OS from the start of bevacizumab in a univariate analysis. No prognostic factor of OS was found in the multivariate analysis. The IDH and MGMT status was unknown in 74% and 83% of cases, respectively, and their predictive effect was not analyzed.
The authors concluded that bevacizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy could be beneficial as a late-line therapy in a subset of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. The median time-to-progression was higher in patients with methylated MGMT promoter tumors. Further analyses of larger cohorts of patients are needed to identify clinical, radiological, and molecular prognostic factors of bevacizumab response.
Reference
Yahia-Cherif, M., Luce, S., De Witte, O. et al. Late-line treatment with bevacizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy in recurrent high-grade gliomas. Acta Neurochir 165, 693–699 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05524-7
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.