The trial results were published in the journal JAMA Neurology.
    Individuals suffering from migraines frequently  find themselves navigating a challenging cycle of trying out various  nonspecific preventive medications. This cycle is often driven by two primary  factors: poor tolerability and inadequate efficacy. As a result, many patients  experience low adherence to their prescribed treatments, ultimately leading to  an increased burden of disease. Hence researchers  conducted a 12-month prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, known  as the APPRAISE trial, involving 621 adult participants from 17 countries.  
These individuals, aged 18 years or older, had a history of migraine lasting 12  months or longer and experienced between 4 and fewer than 15 monthly migraine  days (MMDs).    Patients  were randomly assigned to receive either erenumab or OMPMs, with dose  adjustments permitted according to label recommendations. The primary endpoint  of the study was the proportion of patients who completed one year of treatment  and achieved a reduction of 50% or more in MMDs compared to baseline at month  12. Additional  measures assessed in the study encompassed two secondary endpoints: the  cumulative mean change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs) throughout  the treatment duration and the proportion of responders as per the Patients'  Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale at the 12-month mark for patients  adhering to their initially assigned treatment.  
  Findings: 
    The results  of the study were striking. 
    Significantly  more patients treated with erenumab reached the primary endpoint compared to  those on OMPMs. 
    Specifically,  56.2% of patients in the erenumab group achieved the desired reduction in MMDs,  while only 16.8% of patients in the OMPM group reached the same milestone. 
    Furthermore,  erenumab demonstrated higher responder rates on the Patients' Global Impression  of Change (PGIC) scale, indicating greater overall satisfaction with treatment.  
  In addition  to improved efficacy, erenumab also exhibited superior tolerability and  adherence compared to OMPMs. 
    The study findings revealed a noteworthy  reduction in the cumulative average monthly migraine days (MMDs) among patients  receiving erenumab compared to those treated with nonspecific oral migraine  preventive medications (OMPMs).  
  Fewer  patients in the erenumab group switched medications or discontinued treatment  due to adverse events, highlighting the potential for better patient outcomes  with this specific preventive medication.
  The study's  implications extend beyond clinical practice, offering hope to millions of  individuals worldwide who suffer from episodic migraine. 
By identifying a  specific medication that demonstrates superior efficacy, tolerability, and  adherence, researchers have paved the way for more targeted and personalized  treatment approaches in the management of this debilitating condition. As further  research continues to unfold, the potential for erenumab to revolutionize the  treatment landscape for episodic migraine appears increasingly promising. With  continued advancements in medical science, individuals affected by this  condition can look forward to a future marked by improved symptom management  and enhanced quality of life.
Further reading: Pozo-Rosich P, Dolezil D, Paemeleire K, et al. Early Use of Erenumab vs Nonspecific Oral Migraine Preventives: The APPRAISE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. Published online March 25, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0368. 
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.