Topical Tranexamic Acid associated with Reduced Blood Loss in Spine Surgery

Written By :  Dr. Krishna Shah
Medically Reviewed By :  Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2023-10-20 14:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-20 14:32 GMT
Advertisement

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug associated with reduced blood loss in a range of surgical specialties, including neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, and cardiac surgery. Concerns about venous thromboembolism and seizures from intravenous (IV) TXA have led to increased use of topical TXA.

In spine surgery, perioperative tranexamic acid (TXA) administration is an accepted method for decreasing blood loss and risk of transfusion. TXA acts as a clot stabilizer and can reduce visible blood loss (VBL), hidden blood loss (HBL), and postoperative blood loss (PBL). TXA can effectively reduce blood loss when administered orally, intravenously, topically, or as a combination of the latter two routes.

Advertisement

In neurosurgery, intravenous (IV) TXA is the most studied TXA administration route. Nonetheless, there remain concerns regarding postoperative seizures and thromboembolic events after IV TXA administration, with the highest reported incidence of seizure being 3.5%. Topical TXA limits systemic exposure, expanding the clinical indications of TXA. There have been limited investigations into the safety and efficacy of topical TXA in the wider clinical context of spinal oncology, cervical spine disorders, and thoracolumbar trauma.

Izima et al conducted a meta analysis about efficacy of TXA used topically in spine surgery, and published their findings recently in Neurosurgery Focus journal.

Their comprehensive review and meta-analysis scrutinizes recent studies from 2016 to 2022 to assess the efficacy and safety of topical Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in reducing perioperative blood loss in spine surgery. They categorized their findings as follows:

Safety Concerns:

The review found inconclusive evidence concerning  adverse effects, especially when TXA is administered topically. Although studies report rare events like venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism, no significant differences in complication rates were observed among groups treated with topical TXA, IV TXA, or a combination of both. Most reviewed studies reported zero complications following any form of TXA administration.

Efficacy:

The review emphasizes the positive effects of topical TXA in limiting surgical blood loss. Their pooled analyses, comparing topical TXA to no TXA, indicated statistically significant benefits such as reduced intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, elevated postoperative hemoglobin levels, and shorter hospital stays. Although intravenous TXA has been more widely studied, our pooled analysis found no significant differences in outcomes between intravenous and topical TXA.

Combined Administration:

An intriguing question is whether combining topical and IV TXA produces additive effects in reducing blood loss. The pooled analysis did not find significant synergistic effects when both were used together, a finding that diverges from some previous studies. More research is needed to definitively conclude whether combined administration is superior to IV TXA alone.

Impact on Transfusion Rates:

Even though standard deviations for transfusion rates were not available, making them unsuitable for pooled analysis, individual studies showed reduced transfusion rates in the topical TXA and combined TXA groups compared to controls. These findings have clinical significance given the risks associated with transfusions.

The meta analysis led the authors to conclude that topical TXA was associated with lower intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, higher postoperative hemoglobin levels, and shorter hospitalization lengths, compared to controls. “Given these benefits and its relative safety profile, topical TXA could become a critical tool in the management of spine surgery patients. Further research is warranted to conclusively establish its effectiveness, especially in high-risk patients. “, they said.

Reference: 

Izima, C., Sampath, S. G., Tang, A. J., Ambati, V. S., Chou, D., & Chan, A. K. (2023). Systematic review and meta-analysis of topical tranexamic acid in spine surgery. Neurosurgical Focus, 55(4), E18. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.7.FOCUS23363

Tags:    
Article Source : Neurosurgical Focus

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News