6 NEET 2026 candidates move SC alleging OMR sheet discrepancies

Written By :  Kajal Rajput
Published On 2026-08-05 07:05 GMT   |   Update On 2026-08-05 07:05 GMT
Advertisement

New Delhi: Six candidates who appeared for the re-conducted NEET UG 2026 examination have approached the Supreme Court alleging discrepancies between the answers they marked in their OMR sheets during the examination and the copies of those OMR sheets uploaded by the National Testing Agency (NTA).

According to a PTI report, all six candidates had secured more than 600 or 650 marks and claimed that the OMR sheets made available by the NTA did not reflect the answers they had actually marked during the examination.

Advertisement

The candidates sought an urgent hearing before the commencement of the NEET UG 2026 counselling process.

The matter was mentioned on Tuesday (August 4, 2026) before a Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana.

The lawyer told a Bench comprising Chief Justice Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana that the case pertains to six students who secured more than 600 and 650 marks but claim that the OMR sheets uploaded by the NTA differ from the answers they had actually marked during the examination.

Also Read:NEET OMR Sheet Tampering Allegations Need Credible Evidence, Rules Chhattisgarh HC

He also told the court that the students had emailed the NTA and also visited its office, but received no response.

The Bench then agreed to list the matter for hearing.

The NEET-UG 2026 exam, originally held on May 3, was cancelled following a paper leak and was re-conducted on June 21 by the NTA.

Also Read:MCC NEET reforms: Tamil Nadu to retain its existing MBBS, BDS counselling policy this year

Earlier, A NEET 2026 candidate approached the Delhi High Court alleging discrepancies in the evaluation of his examination, claiming that the score displayed on the National Testing Agency (NTA) result portal changed three times within a span of less than 24 hours. The petition sought judicial intervention for verification of his original physical OMR answer sheet and preservation of all examination-related records.

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News