HC denies relief to MBBS student Challenging Admission Cancellation Over invalid Caste Certificate

Published On 2024-11-04 06:00 GMT   |   Update On 2024-11-04 06:00 GMT

Ahmedabad: The Gujarat High Court recently dismissed a plea by a medical student challenging the cancellation of MBBS admission based on dispute over the case certificate submitted by her.

Holding that the said caste certificate was invalid, the State Government cancelled her admission. Already pursuing the second year of the MBBS course, the student argued that cancellation of her MBBS admission would lead to the wastage of one MBBS seat.

Although she urged the Court to permit her to finish her medical studies, citing that it would not cause any prejudice to the administration, the HC bench comprising Justice Sangeeta Vishen dismissed this argument after observing that the petitioner student had been admitted to the MBBS court by depriving another candidate.

"It is equally true that the petitioner secured the admission depriving the genuine claim of the reserved candidate," observed the HC bench while denying her relief.

Also Read: Supreme Court stays Gujarat HC order cancelling admission of MBBS student

As per the latest media report by the Times of India, back in 2022, the petitioner student, Chaudhary, was admitted to the MBBS course at Ahmedabad-based Narendra Modi Medical College under the Social and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) quota. However, this admission was granted to her provisionally as the confirmation of the admission was subject to the verification of the caste certificate of the student by a scrutiny committee.

Upon investigation, the committee found that the student's caste certificate stating that she belonged to the 'Teli community' was invalid since she failed to establish that her family was a permanent president of Gujarat before April 1, 1978, which was a condition for the caste certificate stipulated in a government resolution in 1994.

TOI has reported that it was a cut-off date on which the SEBC quota was implemented in Gujarat after accepting the Bakshi Commission's recommendations. Meanwhile, the documents submitted by the student showing her family's existence in Gujarat before 1978 were found inadequate.

It was also argued by the student that she secured 507 marks in the National Eligibility-Entrance Test Undergraduate (NEET-UG) in 2022. In this college, the cut-off for the open category was 515 and therefore, she secured admission in the reserved category based on the caste certificate. She further argued that if the scrutiny process had been quicker, she could have secured admission in the open category in any other medical college. 

However, taking note of her submissions, the HC bench clarified that hers was only a provisional admission subject to verification. The Court referred to the provisions of the rules and the Gujarat Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2018 and observed, "The caste certificate was not in tune with the provisions of govt resolutions and hence, as per the provisions of sub-rule (9) of Rule 5 of the Rules of 2017, the provisional admission of the petitioner stood cancelled. Therefore, this Court does not find any error committed by the respondent no.1 (state govt) in cancelling the caste certificate, so also the admission of the petitioner and hence, the petition does not deserve to be entertained and is hereby dismissed."

Also Read: Supreme Court Requests Expert Opinion on Eligibility of 88 per cent Muscular Dystrophy Candidate for MBBS

Tags:    
Article Source : with inputs

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News