NEET UG 2024: SC Junks Plea Seeking Review of Verdict Refusing to Order Re-Exam

Published On 2024-11-07 12:47 GMT   |   Update On 2024-11-07 12:47 GMT

New Delhi: The plea seeking a review of the Supreme Court's August 2 verdict where it had refused to allow a fresh NEET-UG 2024 examination has been dismissed by the apex Court.

While considering the review plea by one Kajal Kumari, the Apex Court bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra dismissed it after observing that there was no error in its verdict, PTI has reported.

"There is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 has been established. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed," the top court bench observed in its October 22 order. Further, the top court bench also rejected the request for an open court hearing on the matter. 

Medical Dialogues had earlier reported that the Supreme Court bench on August 2 had dismissed the pleas seeking a re-test for the NEET-UG 2024 exam after holding that there was no sufficient material on its record to establish that there was a systemic leak or malpractice, compromising the integrity of the examination.

"...sufficient material is not on record at present which indicates a systemic leak or systemic malpractice of other forms. The material on record does not, at present, substantiate the allegation that there has been a widespread malpractice, which compromised the integrity of the exam. To the contrary, an assessment of the data shows there are no deviations which indicate that systemic cheating has taken place," the top court bench had earlier held in its order.

Also Read: SC Junks Plea Challenging two Questions in NEET 2024

CJI Chandrachud, who had authored the verdict on behalf of the bench, observed at that stage the information did not show the question paper being disseminated widely through social media, or the internet, or the answers being communicated to students using sophisticated electronic means, which could prove difficult to trace.

The top court, however, was critical of the conduct of the NTA. It said while the various issues the court dealt with did not lead to the conclusion that the integrity of the NEET was vitiated at a systemic level, "the manner in which NTA organised the exam" in 2024 had given rise to "serious concerns".

It said a body such as the NTA, which was entrusted with the immense responsibility of conducting highly important competitive exams, couldn't afford a "misstep" or take an incorrect decision, amending it at a later stage.

The top court had, therefore, directed the NTA to ensure all concerns highlighted by the court in its judgment were addressed and requested the seven-member committee headed by the former ISRO chairman to be mindful of the same while making recommendations.

Back then, the Supreme Court had also expanded the remit of the Centre-appointed panel -- headed by former Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Chief K Radhakrishnan -- constituted to review the functioning of the National Testing Agency (NTA), which holds the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (Undergraduate) (NEET-UG), and recommend examination reforms.

As the remit of the panel had been expanded, the top court said the committee would submit its report on various measures to rectify deficiencies in the examination system.

Over 23 lakh students took the NEET-UG 2024 held on May 5 for admissions to MBBS, BDS, AYUSH and other related courses.

Also Read: No Systemic Breach in NEET 2024! says Supreme Court, Slams NTA for 'Flip-flops' in Exam

Tags:    
Article Source : with agency inputs

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News