PG Medical Admissions: Delhi HC upholds IP University institutional quota for 50 percent seats
New Delhi - The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition challenging the decision of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) to reserve 50 per cent state quota of PG medical seats to MBBS graduates from its own colleges.
Justice Jayant Nath said GGSIPU is following the dicta of the Supreme Court in various cases which have approved 'institutional reservation' upto 50 per cent of the post graduate seats.
Read Also: NEET Exemption for MBBS abroad: Delhi HC directs MCI to consider plea
"In view of the stated legal position, this is clearly permissible. The pleas of the petitioners are clearly without merit. There is no merit in the present petition. The same is accordingly dismissed," the court said in its 32-page judgment.
In the petition, various MBBS graduates and students from Jamia Hamdard University had challenged the policy of GGSIPU of allocating the entire 50 per cent state quota of postgraduate medical college seats to MBBS graduates from colleges affiliated only to itself by way of 'Institutional Preference'.
The plea sought direction to the university to amend its admissions guidelines /brochure for the academic year 2020-21 without reserving entire 50 per cent state quota only for graduates of colleges affiliated to itself by way of 'Institutional Preference', as was done in previous academic years and to allow Hamdard institute of Medical Sciences and Research (HIMSR) MBBS graduates in the state-wise merit list.
The plea, through advocate Samar Bansal, said that admission to PG medical courses in India is made from two sources, 50 per cent seats are filled up on the basis of the marks obtained in NEET in which medical graduates from across the country are eligible to appear and 50 per cent are filled up on the basis of rules to be framed in accordance with the law by the State Government appointed authority limited to students who have appeared in NEET which is also called "state quota".
It said this petition relates to 'state quota' and raised the question whether 'Institutional Preference', namely the right of an institution offering postgraduate courses to reserve such seats for undergraduate students from colleges affiliated to itself, can be permitted to be exercised while deciding the manner of allocation of 50 per cent seats of state quota.
Another plea raised by the petitioners was that there is no specific decision taken by the Delhi government regarding the apportionment of the state quota.
It was urged by them that in the absence of a clear statutory stipulation or administrative direction permitting GGSIPU to allocate the entire state quota to the students of its own university, the same is illegal.
Delhi government standing counsel Ramesh Singh submitted that as per the Constitution, the government has the power to regulate. However, he said this is only an enabling provision and the government is following a 'hands off policy'.
"In my opinion, the Government of NCT of Delhi is supporting the action taken by GGSIPU. No fault can be found merely because some formal communication has not been issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi," Justice Nath said.
Advocate T Singhdev, representing the Medical Council of India, said as per the judgement of the Supreme Court it is for the appropriate authority or state to declare the policy and the authority in the present circumstances is GGSIPU.
Read Also: Supreme Court stays bail granted to ex-Fortis Healthcare promoter Shivinder Singh
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.