Supreme Court to hear NEET PG exam matter on October 4
New Delhi: The Supreme Court will hear the plea alleging discrepancies and last-minute changes in the National Eligibility-and-Entrance Test Postgraduate (NEET-PG) Examination 2024 on Friday i.e. October 4, 2024.
Even though the plea was listed for today, it was deferred to Friday as no one appeared on behalf of the Union Government, Times Now has reported.
After several controversies, NBE conducted the NEET-PG 2024 exam on August 11 and its results were declared on August 23. However, approaching the Supreme Court bench, several candidates pointed out how the exam format was changed just one month before the scheduled date and the exam was converted into a two(2) session examination with separate papers for each session which is against NBE's guidelines of having one common examination.
During the last hearing of the case, the Apex Court bench noted that there was no appearance on behalf of the Central Government. Accordingly, the bench had ordered, "We request the presence of any of the Additional Solicitors General to assist this Court in the matter."
"A copy of the order may be communicated to the office of the Solicitor General so that necessary arrangements can be made for representation of the Union of India. List the Petitions on 4 October 2024," it further mentioned.
Also Read: NEET PG 2024: SC Seeks response from NBE on Last Minute Change of Exam Pattern
Medical Dialogues had earlier reported that during the last hearing of the case, while considering the plea, the Supreme Court on September 20 had expressed displeasure over the last-minute changes in the exam pattern by the National Board of Examinations (NBE).
Terming it to be "unusual", the Apex Court bench comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra had issued notice to the NBE, Union Government, asking them to file their counter within a week.
Previously, the petitioner's counsel pointed out that NBE has not released either the question papers or the answer keys. She further added that without knowing the correct answers, it would not be possible for the candidates to assess their performances transparently. She submitted that when the scorecard was released, it did not tally accurately for many candidates.
Regarding the issue of non-disclosure of exam question-answers, the plea stated, "There is a clear lack of transparency in conduct of examinations of NEET PG 2024 since none of the documents which can allow a student to check his/her performance are supplied by the Respondents i.e. neither the (a) question paper, nor (b) the Response sheet filled in by candidates, nor (c) Answer Key is supplied to the students, and merely a score card has been provided along with list of attempted correctly/attempted wrongly sections. The students on perusal of the score cards have found discrepancy in the total number of questions that they attempted which are found to be different than what is stated in the score cards issued to them. Thus, there is a basic flaw in the conduct of the examinations which goes to the root of the matter. However, there is no redressal of the above, and an unfettered power has been vested in the Respondents to conduct examinations, without the necessary checks and balances."
The petitioners also raised grievances against the new marks normalisation method. On this issue, the plea mentioned, "A new procedure for normalization of scores (based on a system applied in AIIMS which has a different kind of paper) was introduced by the Respondents for calculation of scores obtained by candidates in Session 1 and session 2 and for tie breaking it would be counted to the 7th decimal, which is completely arbitrary as two classes of candidates have been created without any reasonable nexus with object being sought to be achieved i.e. getting the best suited candidates their opted specializations."
"The normalisation procedure has completely altered the ranks that students expected to obtain based on their performance in the examination and it has led to clumping of students at each decimal, which would not have happened in case of counting of actual marks. Thus, the specialities will be exhausted on account of some superficial criteria prescribed by the Respondents, which is not reflective of the best candidates available," it added.
As per the latest media report by Times Now, even though the plea was to be heard on Monday i.e. September 30, it got deferred as no one appeared on behalf of the Central Government. CJI Chandrachud has requested all the Additional Solicitor Generals (ASGs) to be there for the upcoming hearing on October 4, 2024.
To view the Supreme Court order, click on the link below:
https://medicaldialogues.in/pdf_upload/supreme-court-254790.pdf
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.