Bond service or Bonded Labour? Supreme Court slams States Mandatory Remote Service bond policies
Supreme Court
New Delhi: The Supreme Court has strongly criticized states imposing a bond on All India Quota (AIQ) MBBS students, forcing them to serve in remote areas after completing their medical courses. The bench, comprising Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh, likened the mandatory bond service policies to "bonded labour," expressing concern over the practice.
The court raised concerns about the fairness of such policies, pointing out that All India Quota students are generally more meritorious than those admitted under the state quota. "How can these talented and meritorious people be treated like bonded labourers?" the bench remarked, stressing that states should not impose mandatory conditions on these students, particularly when they are being asked to serve in areas far removed from their place of origin.
According to PTI report, the apex court made the remarks in view of Uttarakhand High Court upholding a 2009 policy of the state, which mandated the All India Quota students pursuing education in medical colleges in the state to sign a bond and serve the "inaccessible" and "extremely inaccessible" areas for five years in lieu of subsidised fees.
"The students who have qualified in the All India Quota are more meritorious than those admitted under the state quota. How can these talented and meritorious people be treated like bonded labourers?" the bench observed.
For the compulsory rural service bonds, the NMC Task Force recommended transitioning it from compulsory service to a system of positive incentives such as paying higher fees for service in rural areas, granting grace marks, providing reservations in PG or super-specialization seats for completing rural service etc.
"States continue to rely on this compulsory method to compensate for inadequate investment in health resources, playing with the lives of medical students, and public health safety at large. This approach should be avoided as a perpetual solution, as it places undue strain on public health and fails to address the root issue of resource allocation in the healthcare system. States must invest adequately in health infrastructure to sustainably meet public health needs without relying on compulsory service bonds. To alleviate the financial burden on students and foster a more nurturing educational setting, it is proposed to abolish both the seat leaving and compulsory rural service bond," the Task Force mentioned in its report.
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.