Gujarat Doctor suicide case: HC disposes of plea seeking action against cop for not filing FIR

Published On 2023-05-02 11:30 GMT   |   Update On 2023-05-02 11:30 GMT

Ahmedabad: The Gujarat High Court on Monday rejected a plea seeking contempt of court action against a police inspector for not filing an FIR against a Lok Sabha MP named in a note recovered from a man who committed suicide. The court of Justice Ashutosh Shastri and Justice JC Doshi rejected on the grounds of maintainability the plea of Hitarth Chag, the son of Dr Atul Chug, who was...

Login or Register to read the full article

Ahmedabad: The Gujarat High Court on Monday rejected a plea seeking contempt of court action against a police inspector for not filing an FIR against a Lok Sabha MP named in a note recovered from a man who committed suicide.  

The court of Justice Ashutosh Shastri and Justice JC Doshi rejected on the grounds of maintainability the plea of Hitarth Chag, the son of Dr Atul Chug, who was found hanging from the ceiling of his house in Veraval in Gir Somnath district on February 12.

Also Read:Gujarat doctor suicide case: HC issues notice to police officers over no FIR

A note found in the deceased's possession mentioned the name of Bharatiya Janata Party MP Rajesh Chudasama and the latter's father, alleging the duo was responsible for the suicide.

The petitioner claimed his father had lent money to the MP and others since 2008 but they had not repaid these loans, causing him to end his life.

Hitarth Chug, who had moved court after the police refused to lodge an FIR for abetment of suicide against the MP and his father, had sought action against the inspector of Verawal Town police station for contempt of court for not following Supreme Court guidelines in the Lalita Kumar versus Government of Uttar Pradesh case on mandatory registration of FIR.

A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in the 2008 Lalita Kumari versus Government of Uttar Pradesh case held that registration of FIR is mandatory under section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation.

If the information received does not disclose a cognizable offence but indicates the necessity for an inquiry, a preliminary inquiry may be conducted only to ascertain whether the cognizable offence is disclosed or not. The Supreme Court then issued the guidelines regarding the registration of FIR.

Also Read:SC transfers medical student's death case to CBI, abetment to suicide complaint lodged

Tags:    
Article Source : PTI

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News