HC comes to rescue of Gastroenterologist who received notice over failure to report for COVID duty

Published On 2023-10-30 07:08 GMT   |   Update On 2023-11-01 07:36 GMT

Chennai: In a major relief to a surgical gastroenterologist, the Madras High Court (MHC) has dismissed the show cause notice issued by the State against him for allegedly failing to report for Covid duty.Justice Anita Sumanth, presiding over the case further directed the dean of Madras Medical College (MMC) to return all original documents, including the medical practitioner's PG Degree...

Login or Register to read the full article

Chennai: In a major relief to a surgical gastroenterologist, the Madras High Court (MHC) has dismissed the show cause notice issued by the State against him for allegedly failing to report for Covid duty.

Justice Anita Sumanth, presiding over the case further directed the dean of Madras Medical College (MMC) to return all original documents, including the medical practitioner's PG Degree mark sheets, which were submitted at the time of admission.

In September 2021, the State issued a show cause notice alleging that the doctor had failed to report for duty and had not joined the Tamil Nadu Medical Service. Dr Soundara Rajan had completed his post-graduation and Master of Chirurgiae in surgical gastroenterology between 2017 and 2020. As per the bond he had executed, he was obligated to serve the State for a period of two years (2020 - 2022).

Also Read: HC Refuses To Quash Proceedings Against Doctor Charged Under IPC 304ii In Hair Transplant Linked Death Case

However, the petitioner, L Soundara Rajan, sought the MHC's intervention to quash the show cause notice issued against him. Additionally, he requested the court to instruct the dean of MHC to return all original documents.

The petitioner argued that he had not received any official summons for duty from the State, apart from a brief period when he was engaged in Covid duty between September and December 2020.

Subsequently, the court noted that no official posting order was ever sent to the petitioner doctor. Given this situation, the court could not comprehend how the petitioner was expected to report for a duty to which he was never formally assigned, reports DTNext.

Tags:    
Article Source : with inputs

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News