HC asks Delhi Govt to respond on ILBS limiting free treatment for EWS

Written By :  Kajal Rajput
Published On 2026-03-19 06:54 GMT   |   Update On 2026-03-19 06:54 GMT

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Delhi government to respond to a plea challenging the Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences (ILBS) for limiting free treatment for economically weaker sections (EWS) patients.

This action follows a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the NGO Social Justice challenging the decision to provide free treatment to only 10 per cent of beds in the in-patient department and 25 per cent of cases in the out-patient department for economically weaker sections (EWS). 

A bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia issued notice to the Delhi government and ILBS on the public interest litigation (PIL) by NGO Social Justice.

Advocate Satyakam, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that IBLS, a premier government-funded public healthcare institution specialising in serious liver diseases such as hepatitis, cirrhosis and liver cancer, cannot be permitted to adopt a policy which effectively converts it into a “predominantly paid medical institution.” He submitted that the decision was arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution as it discriminated between affluent and indigent patients by denying the latter’s constitutional right to access affordable and timely healthcare, reports PTI.

Also Read:Delhi Govt accuses Chief Secretary of multicrore scam at ILBS, hospital rebuffs all allegations

The court listed the matter for hearing on April 22 and asked the respondents to file their response.

In the petition filed through lawyer Ashok Agarwal and Kumar Utkarsh, the NGO asserted that even private hospitals allotted land by the government at concessional rates are required to provide free treatment to EWS patients to the extent of 10 per cent in-patient department (IPD) and 25 per cent out-patient department (OPD), and a fully government-owned hospital providing the same benefit was “wholly incongruous”.

The PIL highlighted that the Supreme Court has mandated state-run hospitals to ensure equitable access to healthcare without “commercial barriers”, and the “exclusionary and revenue-oriented policy” of ILBS has effectively converted it into a paid hospital, defeating the very purpose of its establishment.

Stressing that ensuring access to health facilities for vulnerable and marginalised was the government’s “core obligation”, the PIL sought a direction to quash ILBS policy and ask it to provide 100 per cent beds and medical services for free treatment to the general public.

Alternatively, directions should be issued to ILBS to enhance the EWS/free category quota to at least 50 per cent, it added.

Also Read:ILBS, Illness To Wellness collaborate to spread awareness on liver diseases

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News