Delhi HC allows couple to continue with gestational surrogacy despite age bar

Published On 2023-10-18 04:00 GMT   |   Update On 2023-10-18 11:09 GMT

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has, prima facie, observed that individuals who have already initiated or undergone the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) process should not be disqualified based on the age restrictions imposed by the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula noted that Section 4(iii)(c)(I) of the...

Login or Register to read the full article

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has, prima facie, observed that individuals who have already initiated or undergone the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) process should not be disqualified based on the age restrictions imposed by the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.

A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula noted that Section 4(iii)(c)(I) of the 2021 Act, which sets age limits for intending parents, should not be applied retrospectively.

Also Read:Delhi HC issues notice on PIL challenging embryologist's appointment on National ART and Surrogacy Board

This section stipulates that surrogacy procedures can only begin if the intending couple is married and within certain age limits.

The court's observations came while allowing a couple, both nearly 51 years old, to continue with gestational surrogacy treatment that they had initiated before the 2021 Act came into effect.

The couple was aggrieved by the age bar introduced through the new act, which prevented them from commissioning surrogacy despite having started the process earlier. The court granted interim relief to the couple, directing that, subject to meeting all other conditions under the 2021 Act and other applicable laws, an eligibility certificate be issued to them, allowing them to proceed with the surrogacy using embryos created through their IVF treatment.

The court recognised the emotional distress endured by the couple due to their inability to proceed with surrogacy and stressed the need for compassionate consideration and interim relief. The Centre has been directed to respond to the couple's challenge to the validity of Section 4(iii)(c)(I) of the 2021 Act.

The court listed the matter for further hearing on December 15.

Tags:    
Article Source : IANS

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News