HC notice to Rajasthan Govt on PIL seeking Rs 50 lakh ex gratia for private doctors who die due to COVID

Published On 2021-05-20 04:00 GMT   |   Update On 2021-05-20 04:00 GMT

Jaipur: The Jaipur bench of Rajasthan High Court has issued a notice to the State Government on a plea asking why private doctors have been kept out of the ambit of the benefit of ex gratia payment of Rs 50 lakh to the families or dependents of those who die due to Covid-19.

The petition was moved by the wife of a private homoeopathic practitioner who had died of Covid-19. The plea sought a direction to the state government to extend the benefit of order April 11, 2020 (Pension 05/2020) to the family and dependent of 'private doctors' practices in all fields, whether belonging to an allopathic, homoeopathic or ayurvedic system of medicine who died of Covid, for ex-gratia payment /compensation of Rs 50 lakh.

As per the PIL, the State had issued guidelines directing that hospitals, dispensaries, clinics, nursing homes, both in the public and private sector to remain functional amidst the pandemic and lockdown. In compliance with the direction, the homoeopathy doctor kept his clinic functional throughout lockdown and even during the period of extended lockdown and served his patients. However, he contracted the infection while running his clinic and died on August 6, 2020, at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Sitapura, Jaipur.

Also Read:No excuse that doctors, nursing staff not ready to go to rural areas: Gujarat HC calls for mandating rural service for doctors

The petitioner stressed, after the demise of her doctor husband, she and her only son are facing a deep penurious situation. The petition mentioned about the order issued by the State government on 11.4.2020 declaring ex-gratia compensation of Rs 50 lakh to the families of a deceased government servant who died of Covid-19 infection while discharging their duties to prevent corona infection.
It further, mentioned another order which declared an ex-gratia compensation of Rs 50 Lacs to the families of contractual employees (sanitation workers, health workers etc.) and employees working on honorarium basis such as Home Guards, Civil Defence Personnel, Asha Sahyoginis, Aanganvani Karyakartas, Anaganvadi Assistants, Mini Asha etc., who died of Covid-19 infection while discharging their duties to prevent corona infection. Amplifying the scope of the order, the government also included even 'Ration Dealers' and 'Accredited Journalists' among the beneficiaries.
Accordingly, the petitioner sought the inclusion of private doctors among the beneficiaries of the scheme. Sunil Samdaria, counsel for the petitioner submitted,
Their families are not entitled even for a single rupee, if he or she is running a private clinic or dispensary and die of Covid-19, while attending and treating patients suffering from myriad diseases, including corona infection. Thus, private doctors are necessarily required to be extended the benefit of the order dated 11.4.2020 (Pension 05/2020) entitling their families or dependents to receive Rs 50 Lac ex-gratia payment/compensation in the event of their death due to Covid-19.
Stating that whether working in the public sector or private sector or running private clinic and dispensaries, doctors have always been the spine of the society, the petitioner asserted that they cannot be left high and dry in the hours of crises on the premise that they are not employed with the Government. It stated,
"Doctors, irrespective of the fact whether they work in the public sector or private sector or they run private clinics or dispensaries are prone to infections, therefore their families are required to be protected."
The counsel further submitted,
"While the government is permitting ex-gratia compensation to the families of 'Ration Dealers' and 'Accredited Journalists', not granting the same to the families of 'private doctors' dying of Covid-19 is absolutely unreasonable, grossly irrational and per see discriminatory making it violative of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India."
The petition averred,
" Health care facilities imparted by the state, though huge, is unable to cater each and every citizen, which is palpable from burgeoning fatalities due to Covid-19. In such circumstances, private medical practitioners are accessible to citizens, which makes former vulnerable to infection. In such circumstances, families of private doctors cannot be denuded of the benefit of ex-gratia payment or compensation in event of death of private practitioner due to Covid-19 more so when even 'ration dealers' and 'accredited journalists,' who have no nexus with the treatment of patients, have been brought in the purview of the order dated 11.4.2020."
Pointing out that doctors are the backbone of the country and it is the duty of the state to protect its citizens, the petitioner referred to Section 2(d) of the National Disaster Management Act, 2005 and Section 12 of the said act that imposes an obligation on the state to provide minimum standards of relief to be provided to persons affected by the disaster. The guidelines for minimum standards of relief clearly stated, " ex gratia assistance on account of loss of life as also assistance on account of damage to houses and for restoration of means of livelihood."
The petitioner subsequently mentioned,
" Private Doctors too are toiling day and night during this pandemic and are playing a quintessential role in keeping up the health of the society. In these difficult times, private doctors are catering to the other mundane health problems which are also necessary to be cured apart from Covid-19.Therefore, the State is under obligation to extend the protective umbrella of the order dated 11.4.2020 to private doctors, more so when they have chosen to protect even 'ration dealers' and 'accredited journalists', who are in no way remotely connected to the treatment of patients."

Deliberating the PIL, Single Bench of Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma issued a notice to the State and has fixed the case for hearing on July 7.

To read the petition and order click on the links below-

Tags:    

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News