Madras HC: Mentally Disabled persons entitled to doorstep assessment for Disability Certificate

The certificate issued by one Dr Shanthi Chandramohan, Assistant Physician Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College dated 29.02.1992 certifying that Saikumar is permanently mentally disordered was not taken note of by the Institute of Mental Health, Kilpauk.;

Published On 2022-06-02 12:15 GMT | Update On 2022-06-02 12:15 GMT

Madras HC: Mentally Disabled persons entitled to doorstep assessment for Disability Certificate

Chennai: In response to the plea for obtaining a disability certificate in a hospital, the Madras High Court has directed that no individual should need to visit a hospital instead doorstep services should be provided to disabled patients.

The issue pertains to the petition filed by TR Ramanathan of West Mambalam seeking orders to the Institute of Mental Health (IMH) to issue his 61-year-old son Saikumar a 'certificate of mental retardation' so that he could avail himself of a family pension after his demise.

A single bench of Justice GR Swaminathan said "The disabled persons who are obviously entitled to rights guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India are entitled to obtain a certificate under Section 58 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 without any hassle or difficulty."

The court further added, "the assessment process must not cause any difficulty or trauma or even the least burden to the individual concerned. I take judicial notice of the fact that bringing such persons to a congested place like the Government Hospital would trigger considerable stress and anxiety in them. One does not know what can trigger panic and anxiety. It is clinically appropriate that assessment for issuing such certificates is done at their homes. I, therefore, hold that persons suffering from mental retardation or mental illness are entitled to have the assessment done at the place where they reside."

While delivering his order, he also expressed concern by saying "I am personally aware of the challenges faced by caregivers in cremating their disabled wards and children during the peak of Covid19 because of the absence of identification papers such as Aadhaar."

Background

The writ petitioner is on the verge of becoming a nonagenarian. His 61 years old son Shri.R.Saikumar is mentally retarded. The writ petitioner himself became a widower a couple of months back. His son-in-law died a few years ago. He is a pensioner since November 1992. His son would be entitled to receive the family pension benefits after his death. To avail of the said benefit, an entry will have to be made in the petitioner's pension book. For that, a disability certificate must be obtained.

The petitioner's daughter approached the Institute of Mental Health at Kilpauk for obtaining such a certificate. The Institute insisted that Saikumar must be brought for assessment. Saikumar can neither speak nor express himself. He cannot move about freely. He also has a severe anxiety disorder.

The certificate issued by one Dr Shanthi Chandramohan, Assistant Physician Government General Hospital, Madras Medical College dated 29.02.1992 certifying that Saikumar is permanently mentally disordered was not taken note of by the Institute of Mental Health, Kilpauk.

Left with no other option, Saikumar was taken to the Institute of Mental Health, Kilpauk in an ambulance on 26.04.2022. A group of paramedical staff literally bundled him into the vehicle. He was assessed and it was noted that he was mentally retarded. But this was deemed insufficient for the issuance of the certificate. It was insisted that Saikumar should be once again brought to the premises of the second respondent for conducting a few more tests, the petitioner said.

Since Saikumar was traumatized by what happened on 26.04.2022, he developed severe anxiety and became paranoid and whenever anybody entered his home, he held on to the bars of the window.

Even though the petitioner's daughter informed the concerned officials that it was not possible to bring Saikumar for further assessment, the personnel attached to the second respondent Institute declined to pay heed to the same.

To view the official order, click on the following link:

https://medicaldialogues.in/pdf_upload/tr-ramanathan-v-tamil-nadu-state-mental-health-authority-419938-177737.pdf

Article Source : With Inputs

Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.

NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.

Adity Saha

Exploring and learning something new has always been her motto. Adity is currently working as a correspondent and joined Medical Dialogues in 2022. She completed her Bachelor’s degree in Journalism and Mass Communication from Calcutta University, West Bengal, in 2021 and her Master's in the same subject in 2025. She mainly covers the latest health news, doctors' news, hospital and medical college news. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in

Comments Policy

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .