Patient died of fatal Diffuse Axonal Injury, NCDRC exonerates doctor of medical negligence
New Delhi: The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) recently exonerated an Amritsar-based doctor from the charges of medical negligence while treating a patient suffering from accidental injuries.Although family claimed that the patient had died because of the delayed and wrong treatment given by the doctor, the top consumer court noted that the doctor had insisted to take...
New Delhi: The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) recently exonerated an Amritsar-based doctor from the charges of medical negligence while treating a patient suffering from accidental injuries.
Although family claimed that the patient had died because of the delayed and wrong treatment given by the doctor, the top consumer court noted that the doctor had insisted to take the patient to higher facilities and provided First-aid treatment as per the reasonable standard of practice.
Therefore, dismissing the medical negligence complaint, the NCDRC bench noted, "It is known that at times, the professional is confronted with making a choice between the devil and the deep sea and he has to choose the lesser evil. In our considered view, the emergency First-aid treatment was as per reasonable standard of practice of the Opposite Party No.1. We don't find any negligence or failure of duty of care. The death of injured child was due to the fatal Diffuse Axonal Injury."
The history of the case goes back to 2003, when the son of the complainant, about 8 years of age at that time, had met with an accident and had been taken to Sandhu Hospital of Dr. Tej Pal Singh with multiple injuries. After an X-ray, the doctor had allegedly informed the family of the patient that there was no head injury and he will be cured soon. However, the next day patient's condition started deteriorating and the Dr. Singh allegedly denied providing any treatment to the patient.
"It is admitted fact that the OP was not a neurologist or neuro-surgeon, but as a first-aid he treated the patient. He advised number of investigations and CT Scan but the said facilities were not available at Sandhu Hospital. The Opposite Party No.1 repeatedly advised the complainants to take the injured to a specialized hospital at Amritsar but the Complainants failed to follow the advice. Therefore, the child was discharged at 9.00 P.M. on same day."
"Thereafter, the child was referred to Guru Nanak Dev Hospital at Amritsar, but the child was taken to Grover Hospital at Amritsar. There the MRI was conducted from Nijjar Scan Centre and reported by Dr. Vijinder Arora, that it was case of multiple haemorrhagic contusions suggestive of DIFFUSE AXONAL INJURY. Moreover, we have perused the evidence from the witnesses Nanak Singh (Ex.R-3), Inderjit Singh (Ex.R-5) and Kashmir Singh (Ex.R-6) who stated that Dr. Tej Pal Singh explained about serious condition of child and he was insisting that the child be taken to the hospital at Amritsar but Lakha Singh father of child was insisting to treat the child in the hospital of the OP," further noted the Commission.
"The Diffuse Axonal Injury is a fatal condition. It was treated as an emergency by Dr. Tej Pal Singh and given proper first-aid. We don't find any failure of duty of care from Dr. Tej Pal Singh. There was no evidence of intentional delay in referring the patient to the higher centre. The patient's parents themselves were reluctant to go the higher centre."
"It is pertinent to note that the injured expired on 09.02.2003 while under treatment in Grover Hospital and in the meantime Complainants compromised the matter with owner of offending vehicle and the driver after getting handsome amount from them on 11.02.2003 and stated they don't want to proceed and take legal action against anybody; same was recorded on 11.02.2003 at report No.12 in Police Post Nawan Pind, Police Station Jandiala."
"It is known that at times, the professional is confronted with making a choice between the devil and the deep sea and he has to choose the lesser evil. In our considered view, the emergency First-aid treatment was as per reasonable standard of practice of the Opposite Party No.1. We don't find any negligence or failure of duty of care. The death of injured child was due to the fatal Diffuse Axonal Injury."
Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement/treatment or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2024 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd