AstraZeneca gets USD 107 million Pfizer verdict overturned in US cancer drug patent fight
Written By : Ruchika Sharma
Medically Reviewed By : Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli
Published On 2024-08-19 11:15 GMT | Update On 2024-08-19 11:16 GMT
Advertisement
Cambridge: AstraZeneca has convinced a Delaware federal judge to throw out a jury's decision that the company owes USD 107.5 million for infringing cancer-drug patents belonging to Wyeth, a subsidiary of Pfizer. U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly determined that the two patents Pfizer claimed were infringed by AstraZeneca's lung-cancer drug Tagrisso were invalid.
Spokespeople for Pfizer and AstraZeneca did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision.
New York-based Pfizer, which acquired Wyeth in 2009, sued AstraZeneca in 2021. It said that AstraZeneca's Tagrisso infringed patents related to the breast-cancer drug Nerlynx, which Puma Biotechnology makes with a license to Pfizer's patents.
Tagrisso earned UK-based AstraZeneca nearly $5.8 billion in revenue last year, according to a company report.
A jury agreed with Pfizer in May and awarded the company $107.5 million in damages.
According to Reuters, Kennelly ruled for AstraZeneca on Wednesday, finding that the verdict could not stand because the patents lacked valid written descriptions of their inventions and would not enable an ordinary scientist in the field to recreate them.
The case is Wyeth LLC v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, No. 1:21-cv-01338.
For Pfizer: Anthony Insogna, Gasper LaRosa, Jason Winchester, Bethany Biesenthal, John Michalik, Alexis Smith and Jennifer Swize of Jones Day; Sara Horton and Ren-How Harn of Willkie Farr & Gallagher
For AstraZeneca: Christopher Sipes, Einar Stole and Megan Keane of Covington & Burling.
Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .
Disclaimer: This website is primarily for healthcare professionals. The content here does not replace medical advice and should not be used as medical, diagnostic, endorsement, treatment, or prescription advice. Medical science evolves rapidly, and we strive to keep our information current. If you find any discrepancies, please contact us at corrections@medicaldialogues.in. Read our Correction Policy here. Nothing here should be used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. We do not endorse any healthcare advice that contradicts a physician's guidance. Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy. For more details, read our Full Disclaimer here.
NOTE: Join us in combating medical misinformation. If you encounter a questionable health, medical, or medical education claim, email us at factcheck@medicaldialogues.in for evaluation.